| |
|
|
Hey [you]! If you haven't noticed, this is now the old digibutter forums. Go over to the new site!
digibutter.nerr
It's Hi-Technicaaal!
|
| Author |
Message |
Ruki Motomiya
Vampire
Joined: 18 May 2007
Posts: 4127
HP: 96 MP: 1 Lives: 0
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 7:04 pm
|
 |
|
| If I Could Live Forever wrote: | Honestly you're all stupid. It all comes down to biology.
Random mating. If humans all mated within their families, we would never progress as a species. It'd just be the same people over and over and over, no differentiating qualities.
Naturally, people with weaker traits die out and people with stronger traits live longest, and those who live longest make more children to carry these traits. If they breed with multiple individuals, they have a chance to create an even STRONGER individual.
And yeah, animals commit incest if there are no mates from other families... but in that case... it was never EVER about LOVE. It was about KEEPING THE SPECIES ALIVE.
More and more I see nothing but idiots here. It's as though some of you are SO IGNORANT to the truth that you can't even be sensible any more. |
You have quite a few fatal flaws in your arguement.
For example, for your "Exact same thing over and over" scenario, EVERYONE ON THE ENTIRE PLANET would suddenly have to do it. That's essentially impossible, unless we're already so similar it has progressed to the point we are all the "same" in the first place.
The trait thing makes somewhat of sense, until we get to a few key points in my mind. Like, for example, the fact that if the incestual breeding produces weaker things, then they will die off, meaning any incestual relationships in that line will eventully die out. This means that, if it was legal, you still wouldn't have to worry about it, because not everyone will be doing it, causes the downfall of humanity, and those that do will not make a SIGNIFIGANT impact that will fire and brimstone.
The animal thing isn't much comparable. That much is obvious, but likewise, we don't know if animals have the same concept of "love" as we know it. Thus, the point that it was not "love" is useless, as the "love" might not exist in the common place. If you have anything to prove that love has been found
| If I Could Live Forever wrote: | | ssg wrote: | | But what if someone is developing feelings for a relative? What if they were just to date once? Is that bad? |
Yes. Because out of TRILLIONS of people on this planet, why do you choose the one you share blood with? |
Why, out of the TRILLIONS of people on this planet, would you choose one you do NOT share blood with?
I'm sure the answer comes down to things like personality, looks, similarities, etc. etc.
There you go, answer get.
| Flygon wrote: | | If I Could Live Forever wrote: | | ssg wrote: | | But what if someone is developing feelings for a relative? What if they were just to date once? Is that bad? |
Yes. Because out of TRILLIONS of people on this planet, why do you choose the one you share blood with? |
I must agree! Also, the only people who make their own sisters their girlfriends have serious issues. It goes without any saying. |
Also, people in wheelchairs are seriously messed up. 
And, since many points bring up to the "sexual" level, and not surprisingly, a lot of people think that's wrong, I'll put it out simply. I do not think it is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jacking off
Small Sammer Guy
Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 12146
HP: 10 MP: 2 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 7:17 pm
|
|
|
gah, I KNOW incest usually means sex, but I really wasn't talking about the sexual levels of incest.
| Quote: | Why, out of the TRILLIONS of people on this planet, would you choose one you do NOT share blood with?
I'm sure the answer comes down to things like personality, looks, similarities, etc. etc.
There you go, answer get. |
I have to agree with this part. What if your type of girl was one of your relatives? Can people just date a relative just once? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ruki Motomiya
Vampire
Joined: 18 May 2007
Posts: 4127
HP: 96 MP: 1 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 7:22 pm
|
|
|
| ssg wrote: | | gah, I KNOW incest usually means sex, but I really wasn't talking about the sexual levels of incest. |
Assuming that was directed at me...well... I wasn't really directing that comment at anyone. A lot of people seemed to be talking about those seperations, I noticed, so I just decided to put down my thoughts on it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jacking off
Small Sammer Guy
Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 12146
HP: 10 MP: 2 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 7:32 pm
|
|
|
| Ruki Motomiya wrote: | | ssg wrote: | | gah, I KNOW incest usually means sex, but I really wasn't talking about the sexual levels of incest. |
Assuming that was directed at me...well... I wasn't really directing that comment at anyone. A lot of people seemed to be talking about those seperations, I noticed, so I just decided to put down my thoughts on it. |
I was directing to those who THINKS incest means sex. Not really you 
People only thinks incest is sex because they watch too much hentai |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
|
