| Author |
Message |
Blue Eyes wins.
Captain Blue
Joined: 21 May 2007
Posts: 15314
HP: 95 MP: 10 Lives: 2
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:33 am
|
 |
|
|
I'm neutral in this... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Para
Joined: 19 Jun 2007
Posts: 7631
HP: 99 MP: 6 Lives: 1
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:57 am
|
|
|
| Timpani wrote: | Routing (or routeing) is the process of selecting paths in a network along which to send data or physical traffic.
Routing directs forwarding, the passing of logically addressed packets from their source toward their ultimate destination through intermediary nodes; typically hardware devices called routers, bridges, gateways, firewalls, or switches. Ordinary computers with multiple network cards can also forward packets and perform routing, though with more limited functionality and performance. The routing process usually directs forwarding on the basis of routing tables which maintain a record of the routes to various network destinations. Thus constructing routing tables, which are held in the routers' memory, becomes very important for efficient routing.
Routing, in a more narrow sense of the term, is often contrasted with bridging in its assumption that network addresses are structured and that similar addresses imply proximity within the network. Because structured addresses allow a single routing table entry to represent the route to a group of devices, structured addressing (routing, in the narrow sense) outperforms unstructured addressing (bridging) in large networks, and has become the dominant form of addressing on the Internet, though bridging is still widely used, albeit within localized environments.
Packet-switched networks, such as the Internet, split data up into packets, each labeled with the complete destination address and each routed individually. Circuit switched networks, such as the voice telephone network, also perform routing, in order to find paths for circuits (such as telephone calls) over which they can send large amounts of data without continually repeating the complete destination address.
Traditional IP routing stays relatively simple because it uses next-hop routing where the router only needs to consider where it sends the packet, and does not need to consider the subsequent path of the packet on the remaining hops. However, more complex routing strategies can be, and are, often used in systems such as MPLS, ATM or Frame Relay, which are sometimes used as underlying technologies to support IP networks.
Now that's not rooting for someone. |
Nobody effin' cares. Count_Bleck<Count Bleck |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PEPSIMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!
Cherry
Vampire
Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 22614
HP: 65 MP: 6 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:50 pm
|
|
|
| Captain Blue wrote: | | I'm neutral in this... |
Me as well, in fact, I will officially never vote in one of these ever again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LIL BLUE VS. BIG BLUE
Crappy Blue Luigi
Vampire
Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 10439
HP: 95 MP: 7 Lives: 2
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:24 pm
|
|
|
| Chaos Dimentio wrote: | | Paper Luigi wrote: | | GOOOO COUNT BLECK! COUNT_BLECK HAS REALLY BAD GRAMMER! I'M ROUTIN FOR YA, 'OL BLECK! WOOO! |
Don't you mean 'rooting', not 'routing'?  |
Don't you mean 'grammar', not 'grammer'? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WHO HA HOO HEY HOOM
Paper Luigi
Vampire
Joined: 09 May 2007
Posts: 6855
HP: 1 MP: 7 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:25 pm
|
|
|
| Crazy wrote: | | Chaos Dimentio wrote: | | Paper Luigi wrote: | | GOOOO COUNT BLECK! COUNT_BLECK HAS REALLY BAD GRAMMER! I'M ROUTIN FOR YA, 'OL BLECK! WOOO! |
Don't you mean 'rooting', not 'routing'? |
Don't you mean 'grammar', not 'grammer'? |
NOOOOOO! NOT AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blue Eyes wins.
Captain Blue
Joined: 21 May 2007
Posts: 15314
HP: 95 MP: 10 Lives: 2
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:08 pm
|
|
|
| Miles Edgeworth wrote: | | Captain Blue wrote: | | I'm neutral in this... |
Me as well, in fact, I will officially never vote in one of these ever again. |
High-five, man! We're smarter than these goofballs! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mister I
Almaz
Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 19527
HP: 43 MP: 10 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:34 pm
|
|
|
|
Yeah...I feel like making a "TOM NOOK IZ NOT GUNNA BE IN BRAWL!" topic on Gamefaqs more than take a side on another name war. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blue Eyes wins.
Captain Blue
Joined: 21 May 2007
Posts: 15314
HP: 95 MP: 10 Lives: 2
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:01 pm
|
|
|
|
Bacon. And I agree with ya. This is POINTLESS! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
High Priestess Paula
Count_Bleck
Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 29980
HP: 30 MP: 2 Lives: 9
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:35 am
|
|
|
|
I won the faker never answered light prognosticus |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
I see what you are doing.
Lord Vaati
Joined: 19 May 2007
Posts: 20393
HP: 99 MP: 10 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:47 am
|
|
|
| count_bleck wrote: | | I won the faker never answered light prognosticus |
what question was that |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The book
Light Prognosticus
Vampire
Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 3973
HP: 88 MP: 10 Lives: 2
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:45 am
|
|
|
| Vaati wrote: | | count_bleck wrote: | | I won the faker never answered light prognosticus |
what question was that |
Many questions, like in "That's my Bowser" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
I see what you are doing.
Lord Vaati
Joined: 19 May 2007
Posts: 20393
HP: 99 MP: 10 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:15 am
|
|
|
| Light Prognosticus wrote: | | Vaati wrote: | | count_bleck wrote: | | I won the faker never answered light prognosticus |
what question was that |
Many questions, like in "That's my Bowser" |
I forgot what it was |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Burn them out
rawrskey
Benned Vampire
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 14262
HP: 70 MP: 5 Lives: 5
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:48 am
|
|
|
|
dude this topic is old why is everyone posting in it =) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cool
Lord Bob
Vampire
Joined: 05 May 2007
Posts: 21056
HP: 61 MP: 8 Lives: 5
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 10:33 am
|
|
|
|
count_bleck joined long before Count Bleck did. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Transfigured Buizel
Champiness
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
Posts: 1391
HP: 10 MP: 0 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:58 pm
|
|
|
|
Count Bleck is a much better Bleck than Count_Bleck. It's just the *bleck* facts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
