digibutter.nerr

[Lord Bob]

Really, I do. This man was so much better than Hitler. He managed to kill way more people in his own country and still stay in power for longer. This may seem morbid, but really, the man was brilliant. Hitler couldn't manage to take over a few countries without opposition, and all Stalin does is sit at home, seeing to the deaths of millions. If I were a dictator or tyrant, I'd aspire to be like him. Except for the going crazy at the end, that wasn't so great. But brilliance and madness sometimes mix.

[BAMFing ARCHER]

For the average person, he's an evil dictator.

But for evil dictators, he's a pretty impressive one. Rather good at his role, if I may say so.

But as they say: Drinking Brilliance and driving insanity don't mix.

[Celeste Dimentia]

That guy was super paranoid... killing his own men left and right out of (often, I think) phantom fears. I wouldn't admire the existence more than I might pity it. o.o

[Mana7]

The problem with that is that Stalin is in a much more corrupt part of the world where conquest is easier, while Hitler was trying to take over Europe which had and probably always will have a strongly formed alliances and many other things