| Author |
Message |
THE BIRTHDAY GIRL
King Harkinian
Burning
Joined: 03 Feb 2008
Posts: 5620
HP: 88 MP: 10 Lives: 0
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 10:03 am
|
 |
|
|
Saw it on Friday in IMAX. Very funny (especially if you love history.) Ben Stiller and Amy Adams make an adorable couple, Abe Lincoln kicks serious ass, and Hank Azaria brings the house down as Kamunrah, a lisping, tyrannical pharaoh. Special note: at one point, the Jonas Bros. (EEWWW....) appear as three Cupid statues, and Ben Stiller tells them that they are pitchy and obnoxious. Amy Adams says they're adorable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fat Tuper
lovegod703
Joined: 06 May 2008
Posts: 5515
HP: 10 MP: 6 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 3:34 pm
|
|
|
You fail miserably at having a good sense of humor if you thought that this movie was funny. I saw it because I like the first one, but this one was just total shit.
———————————> |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Apparently missed a lot
LudwigVonKoopa
Vampire
Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Posts: 17649
HP: 5 MP: 2 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 4:36 pm
|
|
|
|
You two lovebirds have a falling out? *shot* |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
THE BIRTHDAY GIRL
King Harkinian
Burning
Joined: 03 Feb 2008
Posts: 5620
HP: 88 MP: 10 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 9:21 pm
|
|
|
| Fat Tuper wrote: | You fail miserably at having a good sense of humor if you thought that this movie was funny. I saw it because I like the first one, but this one was just total shit.
———————————> |
YOU CAN'T DISAGREE WITH ME, WE'RE IN LOVE (I THINK) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cool
Lord Bob
Vampire
Joined: 05 May 2007
Posts: 21056
HP: 61 MP: 8 Lives: 5
|
| Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 12:35 am
|
|
|
BEN STILLER?
But in all seriousness, is it really all that great? I really don't think there should have been a sequel, as the first one was okay but not great. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fat Tuper
lovegod703
Joined: 06 May 2008
Posts: 5515
HP: 10 MP: 6 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 11:04 am
|
|
|
| Lord Bob wrote: | | is it really all that great? No, it isn't. It pretty much totally sucks. I laughed at 2, MAYBE 3 parts in the whole movie, and in the reast I'm just like: No. Epic fail. I really don't think there should have been a sequel, as the first one was okay but not great. I agree with the company, in that there should be a sequel, but not if it was like it was. There was Sonny With a Chance level humor, at best. Not to mention the jonas Brothers were in it. That ruined the whole thing. I aso think that they should have had Hitler alongside Al Capone, Ivan the Terrible, and Napolean. |
———————————>
Last edited by lovegod703 on Tue May 26, 2009 7:34 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Super ShadowArticuno
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 29080
HP: 99 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 7:15 pm
|
|
|
I cringed when I first saw the trailer during one of my late-night insomniac channel surfing sessions. I'll probably have to see it because a friend of my mother's really enjoyed it.
Night at the Museum had a good ending. It summed things up. It was happy. They didn't have to go and cash in on the first movie by thinking up another conflict just so we can sit through another 90 minutes of miniature Romans and cowboys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
