Author |
Message |
SuperYoshi3 Super ronery pirrow Vampire
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 9503
HP: 54 MP: 4 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 7:29 am
|
|
|
That's my opinion. PS1 pwns PS2 and 3. The games were better ;~; Too bad the games for PS2 and 3 are not as good as the ones on PS1. Good ol' days. WHO AGREEZ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
That rich guy Pure-??? Vampire
Joined: 29 Apr 2007 Posts: 9560
HP: 88 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:29 am
|
|
|
2>1>3
becasue teh 2 had as many good games as 1, but also backwards compatibility. The PS3 has backwards compatibility, but It still costs too much. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RULE ONE OF FIGHT CLUB Steve
Joined: 21 Sep 2007 Posts: 11460
HP: 100 MP: 0 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:31 am
|
|
|
Pure-??? wrote: | 2>1>3
becasue teh 2 had as many good games as 1, but also backwards compatibility. The PS3 has backwards compatibility, but It still costs too much. | Actually, you have to buy a crappy fiddly add-on to play PS2 games on the PS3 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
That rich guy Pure-??? Vampire
Joined: 29 Apr 2007 Posts: 9560
HP: 88 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:33 am
|
|
|
Enigma wrote: | Pure-??? wrote: | 2>1>3
becasue teh 2 had as many good games as 1, but also backwards compatibility. The PS3 has backwards compatibility, but It still costs too much. | Actually, you have to buy a crappy fiddly add-on to play PS2 games on the PS3 |
Then it's even worse. I already thought it sucked.
IN MY OPINION, THE PS3 IS THE WORST SYSTEM EVER MADE, BARRING THE CD-I(Ignoring that it caused TYP) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sind Vampire
Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 1702
HP: 90 MP: 10 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:36 am
|
|
|
Yup, there is the 600$ PS3, with 60Gb and PS2 games playable, and the 300$ version with 40Gb, and without PS2 mode.
Edit: I forgot to say that PS3 has no rumble function, yet. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
He's that guy. Merlink
Joined: 16 Aug 2007 Posts: 3522
HP: 10 MP: 1 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:57 am
|
|
|
Pure-??? wrote: | Enigma wrote: | Pure-??? wrote: | 2>1>3
becasue teh 2 had as many good games as 1, but also backwards compatibility. The PS3 has backwards compatibility, but It still costs too much. | Actually, you have to buy a crappy fiddly add-on to play PS2 games on the PS3 |
Then it's even worse. I already thought it sucked.
IN MY OPINION, THE PS3 IS THE WORST SYSTEM EVER MADE, BARRING THE CD-I(Ignoring that it caused TYP) |
TYP? TooYoobPoop? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
That rich guy Pure-??? Vampire
Joined: 29 Apr 2007 Posts: 9560
HP: 88 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:59 am
|
|
|
Merlink wrote: | Pure-??? wrote: | Enigma wrote: | Pure-??? wrote: | 2>1>3
becasue teh 2 had as many good games as 1, but also backwards compatibility. The PS3 has backwards compatibility, but It still costs too much. | Actually, you have to buy a crappy fiddly add-on to play PS2 games on the PS3 |
Then it's even worse. I already thought it sucked.
IN MY OPINION, THE PS3 IS THE WORST SYSTEM EVER MADE, BARRING THE CD-I(Ignoring that it caused TYP) |
TYP? TooYoobPoop? |
... shut up. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Elite Nerr Francis

Joined: 16 Apr 2007 Posts: 6974
HP: 50 MP: 3 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:16 pm
|
|
|
Sorry but I found the PS1 to be unplayable. The graphics hurt my eyes as I strained to make out what a jumble of polygons were supposed to be. The textures were a blocky pixelated mess. Load times were criminal. And the controller had no analog stick.
IMO, if the N64 had a CD-ROM drive, the PS1 would have died an early death. (Cinematic games would not have been forced to be on PS1) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Negi-chama Super Tsuki Vampire
Joined: 31 Jul 2007 Posts: 40464
HP: 100 MP: 0 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:21 pm
|
|
|
Add on for the PS3 to play PS2 games? Tell that to my PS3. It plays PS2 games whenever I want it too. (Of course, that only consists of ToL and TotA) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Negi-chama Super Tsuki Vampire
Joined: 31 Jul 2007 Posts: 40464
HP: 100 MP: 0 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:24 pm
|
|
|
Sind wrote: | Yup, there is the 600$ PS3, with 60Gb and PS2 games playable, and the 300$ version with 40Gb, and without PS2 mode.
Edit: I forgot to say that PS3 has no rumble function, yet. |
$600? I got mine for $150... and it plays PS2 games... 0.o; |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Super Cyber Mario Burning Vampire
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 5387
HP: 60 MP: 7 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:29 pm
|
|
|
Ps2=Ps3>ps1 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Shadowlugia INeedScissors61 Vampire
Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 4958
HP: 74 MP: 2 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 2:07 pm
|
|
|
The PS3 is one of the BEST systems ever made, but the price and lack of quality games mean it's not worth it. Those two reasons lead to me never owning a Sony product. They're overpriced, and have crappy games. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
That rich guy Pure-??? Vampire
Joined: 29 Apr 2007 Posts: 9560
HP: 88 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 2:25 pm
|
|
|
Shadowlugia wrote: | The PS3 is one of the BEST systems ever made, but the price and lack of quality games mean it's not worth it. Those two reasons lead to me never owning a Sony product. They're overpriced, and have crappy games. |
overpriced+no good games=horrible regardless of actual capabilities. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hellza Ballza Goron Mask Dead

Joined: 14 Jul 2007 Posts: 29930
HP: 0 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 2:28 pm
|
|
|
ps1<ps3<ps2, IMO. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Poyo! Kirby
Joined: 21 Jun 2007 Posts: 1922
HP: 99 MP: 10 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 2:41 pm
|
|
|
PS2>PS1>PS3 PS2 has a crap load of good games PS1 has classics such as the original Crashes and Spyros, or Parappa Teh Rapper PS3 has, er, Ratchet and Clank? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|