ye cannot deny that humans have a nature. Moreover, seeing that infants be born with a fine array a gnostic neurons, archetypes 'n ideas really exist within the human system. Psychology be not a science a reality, albeit what be wrong with studying a system within it be confines. In fact, any meta-level a study would have absolutely no direct implications t' one’s perception a daily life. Whenever we hear ourselves spoken a reductionisticly, it bears no effect t' the holistic image a ourselves; Euclid’s 5th Common Notion: the whole be greater than the part. Thus, if we claim t' be sentient, we must at least be aware a our system 'n it be confines. Sure, psychology be greatly folklore, speaking a dreams 'n delusions, but it be a required aspect a life. Say the Myers-Briggs Indicator, the classifications be not set in stone, say the fundamental particles a the human mind, but each component be a reasonable trait with definite dichotomy. I would continue ta say, that the four traits cover the greater part a pigeonholing personalities, an ideal which I believe t' be achievable. As we be a the same species, our synopsis be quite similar, as be our mannerisms. The existence a society stands testament t' this.