digibutter.nerr Forum Index
Hey [you]! If you haven't noticed, this is now the old digibutter forums. Go over to the new site!
digibutter.nerr
It's Hi-Technicaaal!

Where did Nintendo's creativeness go :(
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next  
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    digibutter.nerr Forum Index -> Gaming
Author Message
and I control the decks
carfilledwithfish



Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 3988

HP: 88 MP: 7 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 5:17 pm   Reply with quote

Cuban Pete wrote:
Cid wrote:
Gold Prognosticus wrote:
I'm getting tired of people going on about this.

1. I don't care about the casual/core argument - if a game looks good, I play it.


The main reason we're arguing about casual/core is because casual games do tend to be bad, most of the time. Poorly made, that isn't a trait that relies on taste.

Quote:

3. VIRTUAL. CONSOLE.


Xbox Live Arcade.

Quote:
I don't know whether I should laugh or be angry at you guys for going on and on and on about this. NINTENDO IS FINE. JUST BECAUSE THE GAMES AREN'T MARIO OR ZELDA OR WHATEVER DOESN'T MEAN THEY'RE BAD.


In the absense of Mario, Metroid or Zelda, we get what is essentially a port of Animal Crossing, a decent-but-short Wii Platformer (Wario), a couple more good games here and there, and, well, Wii *Insert title here* and a bunch of lackluster third party games. There is a problem with Wii's library, and a Nintendo console has never had this large of an amount of crappy titles over good titles- and Nintendo's focus has, indeed, shifted, as evidenced by the last E3's press conference. Nothing but non-gamer gimmicky games. They thought that Animal Crossing and GTA DS would hold the core audience out; well, they didn't.
Oh, quit your *crag* complaining and just *crag* deal with it, You're being a drama queen. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ

"Just deal with" games that aren't good, or play games that are actually fun on a different console?
Hm...
Back to top
   
darkzero
Rusty Shackleford
Vampire


Joined: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 16661

HP: 1 MP: 2 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 5:31 pm   Reply with quote

Dr. Eurhok wrote:
Cuban Pete wrote:
Cid wrote:
Gold Prognosticus wrote:
I'm getting tired of people going on about this.

1. I don't care about the casual/core argument - if a game looks good, I play it.


The main reason we're arguing about casual/core is because casual games do tend to be bad, most of the time. Poorly made, that isn't a trait that relies on taste.

Quote:

3. VIRTUAL. CONSOLE.


Xbox Live Arcade.

Quote:
I don't know whether I should laugh or be angry at you guys for going on and on and on about this. NINTENDO IS FINE. JUST BECAUSE THE GAMES AREN'T MARIO OR ZELDA OR WHATEVER DOESN'T MEAN THEY'RE BAD.


In the absense of Mario, Metroid or Zelda, we get what is essentially a port of Animal Crossing, a decent-but-short Wii Platformer (Wario), a couple more good games here and there, and, well, Wii *Insert title here* and a bunch of lackluster third party games. There is a problem with Wii's library, and a Nintendo console has never had this large of an amount of crappy titles over good titles- and Nintendo's focus has, indeed, shifted, as evidenced by the last E3's press conference. Nothing but non-gamer gimmicky games. They thought that Animal Crossing and GTA DS would hold the core audience out; well, they didn't.
Oh, quit your *crag* complaining and just *crag* deal with it, You're being a drama queen. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ

"Just deal with" games that aren't good, or play games that are actually fun on a different console?
Hm...
Well really, How many times are you guys going to BAWWWWWWWW about this shit? It's starting to get really *crag* retarded at how much you bash Nintendo because they're doing they're jobs. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ
Back to top
darkzero's Bargain shop    
hai
Spiny



Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 27193

HP: 100 MP: 6 Lives: 1



PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:22 pm   Reply with quote

Plus there's one solution to deal with a game you're not sure of.
RENT THE DAMN THING
YOU GET TO SEE IF IT'S BAD, AND IF IT IS BAD YOU RETURN THE PIECE OF SHIT AND NEVER HAVE TO PAY FULL PRICE FOR ITಠ_ಠ
Back to top
Gemstone Goods    
~A color is just a color~
Frozenwinters



Joined: 30 Aug 2007
Posts: 25292

HP: 1 MP: 0 Lives: 4



PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:47 pm   Reply with quote

I was going to say Tree of Tranquility is a good core game, but that's not really a Nintendo game. >.> I honestly don't care if the game is core or casual, as long as it's fun and I'll play the game more than once.
Back to top
The Carmadox Party    
oar
Super Maiq the Liar



Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 17919

HP: 100 MP: 10 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:07 pm   Reply with quote

Cuban Pete wrote:
Dr. Eurhok wrote:
Cuban Pete wrote:
Cid wrote:
Gold Prognosticus wrote:
I'm getting tired of people going on about this.

1. I don't care about the casual/core argument - if a game looks good, I play it.


The main reason we're arguing about casual/core is because casual games do tend to be bad, most of the time. Poorly made, that isn't a trait that relies on taste.

Quote:

3. VIRTUAL. CONSOLE.


Xbox Live Arcade.

Quote:
I don't know whether I should laugh or be angry at you guys for going on and on and on about this. NINTENDO IS FINE. JUST BECAUSE THE GAMES AREN'T MARIO OR ZELDA OR WHATEVER DOESN'T MEAN THEY'RE BAD.


In the absense of Mario, Metroid or Zelda, we get what is essentially a port of Animal Crossing, a decent-but-short Wii Platformer (Wario), a couple more good games here and there, and, well, Wii *Insert title here* and a bunch of lackluster third party games. There is a problem with Wii's library, and a Nintendo console has never had this large of an amount of crappy titles over good titles- and Nintendo's focus has, indeed, shifted, as evidenced by the last E3's press conference. Nothing but non-gamer gimmicky games. They thought that Animal Crossing and GTA DS would hold the core audience out; well, they didn't.
Oh, quit your *crag* complaining and just *crag* deal with it, You're being a drama queen. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ

"Just deal with" games that aren't good, or play games that are actually fun on a different console?
Hm...
Well really, How many times are you guys going to BAWWWWWWWW about this shit? It's starting to get really *crag* retarded at how much you bash Nintendo because they're doing they're jobs. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ

What job would that be? M'aiq will be perfectly honest when he says it doesn't appear to be "bringing out high-quality games." yeah, their mainstream games like SMG and Metroid are fun, but WiiMusic? If Animal Crossing got a better update than "Gamecube version + Online + WiiSpeak" then M'aiq wouldn't even have to bring it up...

M'aiq just thinks that things will get better if Nintendo goes back to controller-based games. Most of the crap titles currently out are just there to whore out the aiming function.
Back to top
Tamriellic Titles    
Ohh, THAT makes sense!
Tyler
Vampire


Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 11410

HP: 95 MP: 2 Lives: 4



PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:49 pm   Reply with quote

Is Nintendo's "job" to put out one decent game a year now, and lag behind its competitors?
Back to top
Tyler's Sexy Shop    
Yoshi
Vampire


Joined: 15 Dec 2007
Posts: 12475

HP: 60 MP: 6 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:00 pm   Reply with quote

Nintendo wants money.
They thought "Hey! Casuals don't have a single system to play, and they're over half the world! We should milk their money!"

And then they do.
Duh.
Back to top
PSI and more    
ChaosStar
Super Scourge
Vampire


Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Posts: 1156
HP: 100 MP: 9 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:01 pm   Reply with quote

Cuban Pete wrote:
Cid wrote:
Nintendo's marketing team suddenly grew brilliant, and found out that they could actually beat the sales competition this go-around by catering to the casual crowd. Unfortunately, that screwed over us true gamers.


Hello, Number 7.°Д°
◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ

I'm like Azura on Youtube Nr. 23
When he play hacks of SMW he's hardcore and may be like the "must reach" guy. Me and my friend still play Brawl over Wi-fi or in same house, and it's addicting and fun. Azura does the same in most his videos. I ask for wi-fi battles every day.
Back to top
   
Ohh, THAT makes sense!
Tyler
Vampire


Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 11410

HP: 95 MP: 2 Lives: 4



PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:06 pm   Reply with quote

Nr. 22 is a boss on LittleBigPlanet lol
Back to top
Tyler's Sexy Shop    
Cid
Lord Krump



Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 7880

HP: 60 MP: 2 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:28 pm   Reply with quote

Cuban Pete wrote:
Cid wrote:
Gold Prognosticus wrote:
I'm getting tired of people going on about this.

1. I don't care about the casual/core argument - if a game looks good, I play it.


The main reason we're arguing about casual/core is because casual games do tend to be bad, most of the time. Poorly made, that isn't a trait that relies on taste.

Quote:

3. VIRTUAL. CONSOLE.


Xbox Live Arcade.

Quote:
I don't know whether I should laugh or be angry at you guys for going on and on and on about this. NINTENDO IS FINE. JUST BECAUSE THE GAMES AREN'T MARIO OR ZELDA OR WHATEVER DOESN'T MEAN THEY'RE BAD.


In the absense of Mario, Metroid or Zelda, we get what is essentially a port of Animal Crossing, a decent-but-short Wii Platformer (Wario), a couple more good games here and there, and, well, Wii *Insert title here* and a bunch of lackluster third party games. There is a problem with Wii's library, and a Nintendo console has never had this large of an amount of crappy titles over good titles- and Nintendo's focus has, indeed, shifted, as evidenced by the last E3's press conference. Nothing but non-gamer gimmicky games. They thought that Animal Crossing and GTA DS would hold the core audience out; well, they didn't.
Oh, quit your *crag* complaining and just *crag* deal with it, You're being a drama queen. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ


Drama queen? How was I being emotional/dramatic at all?

If you actually wanted to make a point, you could actually do something to make me look wrong. You know, debate intelligently, instead of name-calling and pretending that I'm complaining for no reason. Rolling Eyes

Quote:
Well really, How many times are you guys going to BAWWWWWWWW about this shit? It's starting to get really *crag* retarded at how much you bash Nintendo because they're doing they're jobs. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ


I read this as, "Who cares if Nintendo's console is going in a shitty direction? Shut up and like Nintendo anyway."

Confused
Back to top
The Highwind Goods Store    
darkzero
Rusty Shackleford
Vampire


Joined: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 16661

HP: 1 MP: 2 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:47 pm   Reply with quote

Cid wrote:
Cuban Pete wrote:
Cid wrote:
Gold Prognosticus wrote:
I'm getting tired of people going on about this.

1. I don't care about the casual/core argument - if a game looks good, I play it.


The main reason we're arguing about casual/core is because casual games do tend to be bad, most of the time. Poorly made, that isn't a trait that relies on taste.

Quote:

3. VIRTUAL. CONSOLE.


Xbox Live Arcade.

Quote:
I don't know whether I should laugh or be angry at you guys for going on and on and on about this. NINTENDO IS FINE. JUST BECAUSE THE GAMES AREN'T MARIO OR ZELDA OR WHATEVER DOESN'T MEAN THEY'RE BAD.


In the absense of Mario, Metroid or Zelda, we get what is essentially a port of Animal Crossing, a decent-but-short Wii Platformer (Wario), a couple more good games here and there, and, well, Wii *Insert title here* and a bunch of lackluster third party games. There is a problem with Wii's library, and a Nintendo console has never had this large of an amount of crappy titles over good titles- and Nintendo's focus has, indeed, shifted, as evidenced by the last E3's press conference. Nothing but non-gamer gimmicky games. They thought that Animal Crossing and GTA DS would hold the core audience out; well, they didn't.
Oh, quit your *crag* complaining and just *crag* deal with it, You're being a drama queen. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ


If you actually wanted to make a point, you could actually do something to make me look wrong. You know, debate intelligently, instead of name-calling and pretending that I'm complaining for no reason. Rolling Eyes

Quote:
Well really, How many times are you guys going to BAWWWWWWWW about this shit? It's starting to get really *crag* retarded at how much you bash Nintendo because they're doing they're jobs. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ


I read this as, "Who cares if Nintendo's console is going in a shitty direction? Shut up and like Nintendo anyway."

Confused
Well, You're acting as if Nintendo is your personal slave that makes games that only you will enjoy, They've always been making games that everyone would enjoy since, well, forever, It hasn't really changed, So they're targeting a few games for non-gamers? It's what Miyamoto wanted, It sounds selfish, But this is his dream, He's been wanting to make something like this for a long time, And the people who used to look up to him are being selfish faggots all because they didn't get any "good" games this year, Yet they made brawl, and they made mario, and they made metroid, Making games takes time, Yet you guys are impatient as hell, Would you want a good nintendo game? Or an incomplete one? °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ
Back to top
darkzero's Bargain shop    
oar
Super Maiq the Liar



Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 17919

HP: 100 MP: 10 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:49 pm   Reply with quote

Cuban Pete wrote:
Cid wrote:
Cuban Pete wrote:
Cid wrote:
Gold Prognosticus wrote:
I'm getting tired of people going on about this.

1. I don't care about the casual/core argument - if a game looks good, I play it.


The main reason we're arguing about casual/core is because casual games do tend to be bad, most of the time. Poorly made, that isn't a trait that relies on taste.

Quote:

3. VIRTUAL. CONSOLE.


Xbox Live Arcade.

Quote:
I don't know whether I should laugh or be angry at you guys for going on and on and on about this. NINTENDO IS FINE. JUST BECAUSE THE GAMES AREN'T MARIO OR ZELDA OR WHATEVER DOESN'T MEAN THEY'RE BAD.


In the absense of Mario, Metroid or Zelda, we get what is essentially a port of Animal Crossing, a decent-but-short Wii Platformer (Wario), a couple more good games here and there, and, well, Wii *Insert title here* and a bunch of lackluster third party games. There is a problem with Wii's library, and a Nintendo console has never had this large of an amount of crappy titles over good titles- and Nintendo's focus has, indeed, shifted, as evidenced by the last E3's press conference. Nothing but non-gamer gimmicky games. They thought that Animal Crossing and GTA DS would hold the core audience out; well, they didn't.
Oh, quit your *crag* complaining and just *crag* deal with it, You're being a drama queen. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ


If you actually wanted to make a point, you could actually do something to make me look wrong. You know, debate intelligently, instead of name-calling and pretending that I'm complaining for no reason. Rolling Eyes

Quote:
Well really, How many times are you guys going to BAWWWWWWWW about this shit? It's starting to get really *crag* retarded at how much you bash Nintendo because they're doing they're jobs. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ


I read this as, "Who cares if Nintendo's console is going in a shitty direction? Shut up and like Nintendo anyway."

Confused
Well, You're acting as if Nintendo is your personal slave that makes games that only you will enjoy, They've always been making games that everyone would enjoy since, well, forever, It hasn't really changed, So they're targeting a few games for non-gamers? It's what Miyamoto wanted, It sounds selfish, But this is his dream, He's been wanting to make something like this for a long time, And the people who used to look up to him are being selfish faggots all because they didn't get any "good" games this year, Yet they made brawl, and they made mario, and they made metroid, Making games takes time, Yet you guys are impatient as hell, Would you want a good nintendo game? Or an incomplete one? °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ


Name three great games coming out for the Wii next year.
Back to top
Tamriellic Titles    
Cid
Lord Krump



Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 7880

HP: 60 MP: 2 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:59 pm   Reply with quote

Cuban Pete wrote:
Cid wrote:
Cuban Pete wrote:
Cid wrote:
Gold Prognosticus wrote:
I'm getting tired of people going on about this.

1. I don't care about the casual/core argument - if a game looks good, I play it.


The main reason we're arguing about casual/core is because casual games do tend to be bad, most of the time. Poorly made, that isn't a trait that relies on taste.

Quote:

3. VIRTUAL. CONSOLE.


Xbox Live Arcade.

Quote:
I don't know whether I should laugh or be angry at you guys for going on and on and on about this. NINTENDO IS FINE. JUST BECAUSE THE GAMES AREN'T MARIO OR ZELDA OR WHATEVER DOESN'T MEAN THEY'RE BAD.


In the absense of Mario, Metroid or Zelda, we get what is essentially a port of Animal Crossing, a decent-but-short Wii Platformer (Wario), a couple more good games here and there, and, well, Wii *Insert title here* and a bunch of lackluster third party games. There is a problem with Wii's library, and a Nintendo console has never had this large of an amount of crappy titles over good titles- and Nintendo's focus has, indeed, shifted, as evidenced by the last E3's press conference. Nothing but non-gamer gimmicky games. They thought that Animal Crossing and GTA DS would hold the core audience out; well, they didn't.
Oh, quit your *crag* complaining and just *crag* deal with it, You're being a drama queen. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ


If you actually wanted to make a point, you could actually do something to make me look wrong. You know, debate intelligently, instead of name-calling and pretending that I'm complaining for no reason. Rolling Eyes

Quote:
Well really, How many times are you guys going to BAWWWWWWWW about this shit? It's starting to get really *crag* retarded at how much you bash Nintendo because they're doing they're jobs. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ


I read this as, "Who cares if Nintendo's console is going in a shitty direction? Shut up and like Nintendo anyway."

Confused
Well, You're acting as if Nintendo is your personal slave that makes games that only you will enjoy, They've always been making games that everyone would enjoy since, well, forever, It hasn't really changed, So they're targeting a few games for non-gamers?


They've always made games that were quality. Even WarioWare- a non-gamer game- was great when it first came out. So, yeah, I can enjoy a non-gamer game. However, I can't enjoy a bad nongamer game. And, this generation, more bad nongamer games are appearing on Nintendo's console than quality core games and quality casual games combined. Nintendo definitely [b]is not
doing the same thing they did with previous consoles.

Quote:
It's what Miyamoto wanted, It sounds selfish, But this is his dream, He's been wanting to make something like this for a long time, And the people who used to look up to him are being selfish faggots all because they didn't get any "good" games this year,


I don't think expecting a variety of "good" games makes someone a "selfish faggot." :/

Quote:
Yet they made brawl, and they made mario, and they made metroid, Making games takes time, Yet you guys are impatient as hell, Would you want a good nintendo game? Or an incomplete one? °Д°[/b] ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ


Brawl was disappointing, but that's besides the point. Most of the "good" Wii games- which are about 7-9, now- come out more than a month apart. And, that small library doesn't do a console two years old well, when compared to its other competitors. So, no; releasing more well-developed games wouldn't cause them to be incomplete. What Nintendo needs to do is start putting their focus in the right direction- making quality, memorable games- instead of cheap games that can make alot of money. They could do some awesome stuff if that happened. Maybe even come up with a few new IPs that aren't crappy. But, no, they can mow over their competition- the Xbox 360, with its massive library of good games, for instance- without making those focus changes.

The problem isn't because the fanbase lacks patience. The problem is because Nintendo is forgetting about that little side-effect of videogaming known as "quality" in their ultimate quest for profit.
Back to top
The Highwind Goods Store    
darkzero
Rusty Shackleford
Vampire


Joined: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 16661

HP: 1 MP: 2 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:00 pm   Reply with quote

Maiq the Liar wrote:
Cuban Pete wrote:
Cid wrote:
Cuban Pete wrote:
Cid wrote:
Gold Prognosticus wrote:
I'm getting tired of people going on about this.

1. I don't care about the casual/core argument - if a game looks good, I play it.


The main reason we're arguing about casual/core is because casual games do tend to be bad, most of the time. Poorly made, that isn't a trait that relies on taste.

Quote:

3. VIRTUAL. CONSOLE.


Xbox Live Arcade.

Quote:
I don't know whether I should laugh or be angry at you guys for going on and on and on about this. NINTENDO IS FINE. JUST BECAUSE THE GAMES AREN'T MARIO OR ZELDA OR WHATEVER DOESN'T MEAN THEY'RE BAD.


In the absense of Mario, Metroid or Zelda, we get what is essentially a port of Animal Crossing, a decent-but-short Wii Platformer (Wario), a couple more good games here and there, and, well, Wii *Insert title here* and a bunch of lackluster third party games. There is a problem with Wii's library, and a Nintendo console has never had this large of an amount of crappy titles over good titles- and Nintendo's focus has, indeed, shifted, as evidenced by the last E3's press conference. Nothing but non-gamer gimmicky games. They thought that Animal Crossing and GTA DS would hold the core audience out; well, they didn't.
Oh, quit your *crag* complaining and just *crag* deal with it, You're being a drama queen. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ


If you actually wanted to make a point, you could actually do something to make me look wrong. You know, debate intelligently, instead of name-calling and pretending that I'm complaining for no reason. Rolling Eyes

Quote:
Well really, How many times are you guys going to BAWWWWWWWW about this shit? It's starting to get really *crag* retarded at how much you bash Nintendo because they're doing they're jobs. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ


I read this as, "Who cares if Nintendo's console is going in a shitty direction? Shut up and like Nintendo anyway."

Confused
Well, You're acting as if Nintendo is your personal slave that makes games that only you will enjoy, They've always been making games that everyone would enjoy since, well, forever, It hasn't really changed, So they're targeting a few games for non-gamers? It's what Miyamoto wanted, It sounds selfish, But this is his dream, He's been wanting to make something like this for a long time, And the people who used to look up to him are being selfish faggots all because they didn't get any "good" games this year, Yet they made brawl, and they made mario, and they made metroid, Making games takes time, Yet you guys are impatient as hell, Would you want a good nintendo game? Or an incomplete one? °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ


Name three great games coming out for the Wii next year.
Conduit, Sin and punishment 2, Punch-out!! °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ
Back to top
darkzero's Bargain shop    
Sync
MALAK



Joined: 01 Aug 2007
Posts: 34747
HP: 10 MP: 2 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:07 am   Reply with quote

Tyler wrote:
Is Nintendo's "job" to put out one decent game a year now, and lag behind its competitors?
Hell no, don't even start with that. Usually, the good games they release every year or so, despite being in small numbers, bring them at the right speed next to their competitors. >:U
Back to top
Hammerspace    
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    digibutter.nerr Forum Index -> Gaming
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group