| Guilty or Not? |
| Guilty |
|
66% |
[ 2 ] |
| Not Guilty |
|
33% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 3 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Negi-chama
Super Tsuki
Vampire
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Posts: 40464
HP: 100 MP: 0 Lives: 0
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:40 pm
|
 |
|
| Southern Fried Chicken wrote: | | Crappy Shifty Luigi wrote: | Frozen, Tsuki is correct, we do see this kind of thing in the OT all the time.
As for the court, I say not guilty, since he IS a little on the annoying side...  |
You can't just say not guilty because i am annoying.
| Frozenwinters wrote: | | This is lame trolling, as lame as it is, it is pretty guilty |
It is lame trolling, i didn't really flame back...i don't think i did! Just said that she had no sense of humour unseriously.
Although i probally have no say, since i am the victim... |
As the victim, you have the right to say you were unoffended, and that you wish the prosecuted to be not guilty, it sometimes works. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jacking off
Small Sammer Guy
Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 12146
HP: 10 MP: 2 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:19 pm
|
|
|
| Southern Fried Chicken wrote: | It is lame trolling, i didn't really flame back...i don't think i did! Just said that she had no sense of humour unseriously.
Although i probally have no say, since i am the victim... |
You kinda did flame back...
And you think she has no sense of humor? Look at yourself. -__- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fat Tuper
lovegod703
Joined: 06 May 2008
Posts: 5515
HP: 10 MP: 6 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:34 pm
|
|
|
| Frozenwinters wrote: | | Tsuki wrote: | | Frozenwinters wrote: | | Tsuki wrote: | | Frozenwinters wrote: | | This is lame trolling. As lame as it is, it's pretty guilty. |
Not really. Besides, that ind of thing happens in almost every single topic on OT. |
I don't see it... |
Seriously?
Look harder; it shouldn't be hard. |
Anyway, the "new flame rule" justifies my belief and I will strike the other person or w/e his name is. |
Jr. Troopa tried to make that a real rule because of all the shit going on back in like January and February. It was never actually made a rule. All the mods but him agreed that he didn't have the authority to do that, unless Francis said it was ok. It's not actually an enforcable rule. The old flame rules are the active ones.
———————————> |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bartz Klauser
BAMFing ARCHER
Werewolf
Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 7637
HP: 100 MP: 5 Lives: 4
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:01 pm
|
|
|
| Fat Tuper wrote: | | Frozenwinters wrote: | | Tsuki wrote: | | Frozenwinters wrote: | | Tsuki wrote: | | Frozenwinters wrote: | | This is lame trolling. As lame as it is, it's pretty guilty. |
Not really. Besides, that ind of thing happens in almost every single topic on OT. |
I don't see it... |
Seriously?
Look harder; it shouldn't be hard. |
Anyway, the "new flame rule" justifies my belief and I will strike the other person or w/e his name is. |
Jr. Troopa tried to make that a real rule because of all the shit going on back in like January and February. It was never actually made a rule. All the mods but him agreed that he didn't have the authority to do that, unless Francis said it was ok. It's not actually an enforcable rule. The old flame rules are the active ones.
———————————> |
Wrong. It would have been taken down by the other mods if they didn't agree upon it. I have evidence of this.
The "new Rules" by Troopa that he put up about a month ago. Those were up for a while, until they were taken down. In fact, the rules about minor flame is more or less accepted by the community here. The mods are more aware than that, you know. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fat Tuper
lovegod703
Joined: 06 May 2008
Posts: 5515
HP: 10 MP: 6 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:10 pm
|
|
|
Oh, well nevermind, then.
———————————> |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Master of Puppets...
The Chaos Heart
Joined: 17 Jul 2007
Posts: 4568
HP: 100 MP: 6 Lives: 22
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:32 pm
|
|
|
The general replied back. Unless I missed it, I see no court topic for him.
Also, in the new flame guidlines, it specifically states the moderators will pay no mind to "minor" cases of flame.
Does this really seem major to you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
~A color is just a color~
Frozenwinters
Joined: 30 Aug 2007
Posts: 25292
HP: 1 MP: 0 Lives: 4
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:50 pm
|
|
|
| The Chaos Heart wrote: | The general replied back. Unless I missed it, I see no court topic for him.
Also, in the new flame guidlines, it specifically states the moderators will pay no mind to "minor" cases of flame.
Does this really seem major to you? |
I've already warned Alice for this, and it's happened a lot. I know it says nothing about repetitive minor flame, but something should be done about it. I don't see why Alice is making such a big deal over it anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cid
Lord Krump
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 7880
HP: 60 MP: 2 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:37 pm
|
|
|
| Fat Tuper wrote: | | Frozenwinters wrote: | | Tsuki wrote: | | Frozenwinters wrote: | | Tsuki wrote: | | Frozenwinters wrote: | | This is lame trolling. As lame as it is, it's pretty guilty. |
Not really. Besides, that ind of thing happens in almost every single topic on OT. |
I don't see it... |
Seriously?
Look harder; it shouldn't be hard. |
Anyway, the "new flame rule" justifies my belief and I will strike the other person or w/e his name is. |
Jr. Troopa tried to make that a real rule because of all the shit going on back in like January and February. It was never actually made a rule. All the mods but him agreed that he didn't have the authority to do that, unless Francis said it was ok. It's not actually an enforcable rule. The old flame rules are the active ones.
———————————> |
Are you talking about that sticky in OT? 'Cuz, you know, I'm the one who came up with it and typed it up, while Jr. just sticky'd it for me.
I feel so unnoticed. 
If you're referring to the simplified version Jr. Troopa put in his "rules development" topic in Feedback, my bad; carry on... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
