| Level-up? |
| Yes, but I like both ideas. |
|
20% |
[ 2 ] |
| Yes, but I prefer the 'post' method. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Yes, but I prefer the 'time' method. |
|
50% |
[ 5 ] |
| Yes, but I think there's a better method than the ones stated. |
|
20% |
[ 2 ] |
| No. This is a bad idea. |
|
10% |
[ 1 ] |
| I have no clue what you're talking about. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 10 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Medikoopa
Vampire
Joined: 08 Sep 2007
Posts: 29252
HP: 100 MP: 1 Lives: 3
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:44 am
|
 |
|
After a certain amount of time/posts, the user will 'level up'. By this, think of the Paper Mario series...
The user can choose for an increase of hp or mp by 5 points. There is a third choice, since we do not have any Star Power points: we could request 100 coins.
The following should help explain, depending on which idea you prefer, if any. Please keep in mind that by time I mean 'time active in the forum' not 'time registered in the forum'. Posts is just as it says... the amount of posts made total.
Posts:
Level-up at 5000.
Level up at 7500.
Level up at 10000.
Level-up at 12500.
Level-up at 15000.
Level-up at 17500.
Level-up at 20000.
ect...
---
Time:
Level-up at 3 months.
Level-up at 6 months.
Level-up at 9 months.
Level-up at 12 months.
Level-up at 15 months.
Level-up at 18 months.
Level-up at 21 months.
ect...
----
So, is this a good idea or a bad one? Why? And if you like it, which one would you prefer? If you have any issues with any of this, please say so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
~A color is just a color~
Frozenwinters
Joined: 30 Aug 2007
Posts: 25292
HP: 1 MP: 0 Lives: 4
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:50 am
|
|
|
|
I prefer the time method, just because it wouldn't increase spam, just so users could gain a level. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SuperYoshi3
Super ronery pirrow
Vampire
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 9503
HP: 54 MP: 4 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:01 am
|
|
|
| frozenwinters wrote: | | I prefer the time method, just because it wouldn't increase spam, just so users could gain a level. |
Same here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sind
Vampire
Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 1702
HP: 90 MP: 10 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:06 pm
|
|
|
| smashbro wrote: | | frozenwinters wrote: | | I prefer the time method, just because it wouldn't increase spam, just so users could gain a level. |
Same here. |
What they said. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Logic King
vg
Vampire
Joined: 19 May 2007
Posts: 2032
HP: 90 MP: 10 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:15 pm
|
|
|
|
How about score? (I know the idea has been made before) Thoguh it is seemingly invisible, it seems to be the most accurate about who posts good or bad posts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Richest user. :D
Super Ultimario
Joined: 18 May 2007
Posts: 5704
HP: 100 MP: 4 Lives: 6
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 3:21 pm
|
|
|
| vg wrote: | | How about score? (I know the idea has been made before) Thoguh it is seemingly invisible, it seems to be the most accurate about who posts good or bad posts. |
Agreed with vg. Score is the most useful and accurate, as it gives you no points for posting in Off-Topic or Role-Play Off-Topic, so it would greatly discourage spam. The only problems I see is the fact that score gives you 100 points for every post in your topics, so Fancy Wario (Who made the over 100-page Super Smash Bros. Brawl topic) and other people who make lots of topics would have a really high level. Other than that, score would be great for this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
