... |
I support all of this. |
|
36% |
[ 4 ] |
I support this, but there should be post count in Dump 2.0 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
I support Dump 2.0 without post count. I could care less about the other stuff. |
|
9% |
[ 1 ] |
I support Dump 2.0 with post count. I could care less about the other stuff. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
I support everything here except Dump 2.0. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
I support Dump 2.0 without post count, but no to the other stuff. |
|
18% |
[ 2 ] |
I support Dump 2.0 with post count, but no to the other stuff. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
I do not support any of this. |
|
18% |
[ 2 ] |
Rename RPOT to Casual Role-Playing and decrease spam there, but NO to Dump 2.0 and alts in OT. Alts should be for RP purposes only. |
|
18% |
[ 2 ] |
|
Total Votes : 11 |
|
Author |
Message |
Richest user. :D Super Ultimario
Joined: 18 May 2007 Posts: 5704
HP: 100 MP: 4 Lives: 6
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:03 pm
|
|
|
Current Poll results:
4 people support all of this, 2 people support none of it. 7 people support the Dump 2.0, 4 are against. 6 people like the Casual RP idea, 3 people are against it.
Since RPOT is basically just Off-Topic with alts and the occasional plot that sinks after only a few posts, I say we enable alts in Off-Topic and make a "Casual Role-Playing" forum. This forum would basically be for being in-character, having in-character discussions with other RP characters, develop plots that cover multiple threads, etc, without stuff like, say, Enigma's alt Asplodin Fat Albrt Mudkip posting something about there being too many llamas in his salad. He could then post stuff like that in Off-Topic, which should have alts, as stated before.
Also........I'm hesitant to post this, but.......
The Dump 2.0. Bring back the Dump, but make it WAY worse. Add alts, and make pretty much nothing against the rules there. Flooding, pervertedness, spam........since it's all been affecting OT and RPOT a lot, and since OT and RPOT are, contrary to popular belief, NOT SPAM FORUMS, we should divert the actual spam elsewhere. Make it so that all topics are automatically deleted 48 hours after the topic's last post, to save major bandwiths. Also, there should be no post count, like in the original Dump there. The only things considered "bad" in The Dump 2.0 would be forum borking and [M]-worthy pictures.
Last edited by Super Ultimario on Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:05 pm; edited 6 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hellza Ballza Goron Mask Dead
Joined: 14 Jul 2007 Posts: 29930
HP: 0 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:10 pm
|
|
|
Great ideas. But minis the "No post count part". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
~A color is just a color~ Frozenwinters
Joined: 30 Aug 2007 Posts: 25292
HP: 1 MP: 0 Lives: 4
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:15 pm
|
|
|
Alts in OT has been suggested like four billion times, and I have given reasons why it wouldn't work. >_> |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richest user. :D Super Ultimario
Joined: 18 May 2007 Posts: 5704
HP: 100 MP: 4 Lives: 6
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:21 pm
|
|
|
frozenwinters wrote: | Alts in OT has been suggested like four billion times, and I have given reasons why it wouldn't work. >_> |
Would you mind reposting your reasons here then? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Flavio Vampire
Joined: 05 Jul 2007 Posts: 10649
HP: 4 MP: 7 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:03 pm
|
|
|
Flavio suggested the Dump 2.0 before, and the topic was locked... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
~A color is just a color~ Frozenwinters
Joined: 30 Aug 2007 Posts: 25292
HP: 1 MP: 0 Lives: 4
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:08 pm
|
|
|
UltiMario wrote: | frozenwinters wrote: | Alts in OT has been suggested like four billion times, and I have given reasons why it wouldn't work. >_> |
Would you mind reposting your reasons here then? |
Too much confusion, and honestly, why would you want to combine boards? If you put alts into Off-topic, no more off-topic. You might as well say "Get rid of Off-topic and make a dump lol." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cid Lord Krump
Joined: 21 Apr 2007 Posts: 7880
HP: 60 MP: 2 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:24 pm
|
|
|
I don't think alts should be allowed in forums outside the Role-Playing ones. I believe they were made to help people be more-in-character while role-playing; not to function as secondary profiles/accounts.
Maybe "Off-Topic" could be renamed "Casual Discussion", "Role-Playing Off-Topic" could be renamed "Casual Role-Playing" or "Role-Playing Lite", and a "Serious Discussion" forum could be added to balance the "Casual" and "General" discussion forums out?
"General Discussion" is more a place for general, normal topics, and "Off-Topic" is more a place for simple, fun conversation. If a truly serious forum, involving politics, science, religion and debate could be added, there would be a balance... two on each ends of the topic-content spectrum, and one in the middle. It would create a balance that would be healthy for the community, I think. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TooManyToasters Paper_Waluigi
Joined: 20 May 2007 Posts: 10343
HP: 100 MP: 10 Lives: 1
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:39 pm
|
|
|
OT with alts would be exactly the same as RPOT. I do support bringing back The Dump, though... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
i am the sandwich Vid Inferno Vampire
Joined: 02 Sep 2007 Posts: 6863
HP: 73 MP: 0 Lives: 7
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:46 pm
|
|
|
I'm not the person to spam, but seeing that kind of thing is funny and it takes out the need to spam anywhere else. No post count would prevent people for spamming and getting posts for it, and 48 hours would make sure the unused topics died quickly. I actually agree with it.
But no alts in Off-Topic. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richest user. :D Super Ultimario
Joined: 18 May 2007 Posts: 5704
HP: 100 MP: 4 Lives: 6
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:43 pm
|
|
|
frozenwinters wrote: | Too much confusion, and honestly, why would you want to combine boards? |
Why would you want to seperate them? They're exactly the same, except one has alts and a bit of plot, which sinks easily. And the plot part could easily be put in the Casual Role-Playing forum.
Quote: | If you put alts into Off-topic, no more off-topic. You might as well say "Get rid of Off-topic and make a dump lol." |
Wait, what? How would alts in Off-Topic mean no more off-topic? It would still be the casual, semi-epic and semi-spammy place it's always been. I'm not seeing your point here.
Anyway, I kinda like Lord Crump's idea. Something about the name "Off-Topic" seems to make everybody think "SPAM HERE" when it's NOT a spam forum. Casual Discussion would be a great new name. Though, I don't see much need for a "Serious Discussion" forum, because I suppose General Discussion kind of covers both serious and General topics. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richest user. :D Super Ultimario
Joined: 18 May 2007 Posts: 5704
HP: 100 MP: 4 Lives: 6
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 4:56 pm
|
|
|
Bump, as I see absolutely nothing wrong with any of these ideas. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
OH GOD Manpersonguything Werewolf
Joined: 30 Jul 2007 Posts: 7249
HP: 100 MP: 8 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 5:39 pm
|
|
|
NO! No alts in OT! The only diffrence beetween RPOT and OT is alts. Also, I like the dump idea. I will dramaticly lower jailed people. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richest user. :D Super Ultimario
Joined: 18 May 2007 Posts: 5704
HP: 100 MP: 4 Lives: 6
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 5:48 pm
|
|
|
manpersonguything wrote: | NO! No alts in OT! The only diffrence beetween RPOT and OT is alts. Also, I like the dump idea. I will dramaticly lower jailed people. |
So why keep OT and RPOT apart if that's the only difference? Why have to go to a different forum to post with an alt? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Super ShadowArticuno
Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Posts: 29080
HP: 99 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 5:55 pm
|
|
|
How about I throw in my idea of how it could work?
Dump 2.0 would be hidden, and only appear to people who joined a usergroup for it. That way, it wouldn't bug everyone.
RPOT should be added to the same section as OT, and a Casual RP would be created to replace it.
Anything I missed? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richest user. :D Super Ultimario
Joined: 18 May 2007 Posts: 5704
HP: 100 MP: 4 Lives: 6
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:02 pm
|
|
|
I like the Dump 2.0 being a usergroup-only type thing. Also, the [M] tag would be working in Dump 2, so any non-[M]arked perversion topics would be against the few rules there. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|