Author |
Message |
Elzilcho ohclizlE Burning Vampire
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 6715
HP: 94 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:20 pm
|
|
|
I've just been thinking, it's pretty hard to make final bosses in FPSs, because they have to be beatable while there is an ammo restriction, and not too difficult/puzzle solve-y for the same reason. How do you think they should be played out? Should they even exist?
(Inspiration from watching 'Killing 22 final bosses in 5 minutes') |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LIL BLUE VS. BIG BLUE Crappy Blue Luigi Vampire
Joined: 11 May 2007 Posts: 10439
HP: 95 MP: 7 Lives: 2
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:24 pm
|
|
|
If the FPS had, say, one weapon with no ammo restriction that you maybe start with or forcefully get later on (I.E., you can't skip getting it), then every weapon you have that requires ammo would be taken away, forcing you to use the weapon that has no restrictions on ammo.
Another way of doing it is to have the boss drop ammo over time, either automatically or when you attack it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Elzilcho ohclizlE Burning Vampire
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 6715
HP: 94 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:33 pm
|
|
|
Crappy Blue Luigi wrote: | If the FPS had, say, one weapon with no ammo restriction that you maybe start with or forcefully get later on (I.E., you can't skip getting it), then every weapon you have that requires ammo would be taken away, forcing you to use the weapon that has no restrictions on ammo. | Eh, HL2 did that, with the gravity gun, except for the majority of the endgame + boss, but the 'boss' was boring as hell. So it works, but it just doesn't seem at all interesting or fun in the end. It feels great to utilise your whole arsenal of weapons and abilities, for any genre... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LIL BLUE VS. BIG BLUE Crappy Blue Luigi Vampire
Joined: 11 May 2007 Posts: 10439
HP: 95 MP: 7 Lives: 2
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:38 pm
|
|
|
Elzilcho wrote: | Crappy Blue Luigi wrote: | If the FPS had, say, one weapon with no ammo restriction that you maybe start with or forcefully get later on (I.E., you can't skip getting it), then every weapon you have that requires ammo would be taken away, forcing you to use the weapon that has no restrictions on ammo. | Eh, HL2 did that, with the gravity gun, except for the majority of the endgame + boss, but the 'boss' was boring as hell. So it works, but it just doesn't seem at all interesting or fun in the end. It feels great to utilise your whole arsenal of weapons and abilities, for any genre... |
Yeah, that's why I like my second idea better. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TooManyToasters Paper_Waluigi
Joined: 20 May 2007 Posts: 10343
HP: 100 MP: 10 Lives: 1
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:57 pm
|
|
|
Fighting a single, really strong enemy in an FPS tends to be boring. IMHO, I'd rather slaughter hordes of enemies in an epic last stand. ФֻФ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hai Spiny
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 27193
HP: 100 MP: 6 Lives: 1
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 4:00 pm
|
|
|
I've always been a fan of multiple phases for story heavy games, because it shows that the villan will not give up his power or ambitions so easily, much like you most likely fought through near impossible odds to get this far. A puzzle element is okay occasionally, like getting a boss to expose their weakness, which in this case, there should be an infinite use weapon that the boss is weak to when shot in the sweetspot. All other weapons can rush the weakness revelation, but the boss can reveal it for a super attack all on his own. All this is my opinion rather than a fact, of course. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lolz Shrowser
Joined: 16 Jul 2007 Posts: 8814
HP: 100 MP: 4 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:40 pm
|
|
|
I like the Killzone 2 final boss. It was pretty hard and it wasn't just "shoot'em up". You actually had to use a strategy to defeat it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PC Gamer Alexio Vampire
Joined: 23 Oct 2007 Posts: 1102
HP: 15 MP: 0 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 7:19 pm
|
|
|
The final boss in HL1 was done well and even though the last part of HL2:EP2 wasn't technically a final boss, it was still awesome. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
darkzero Rusty Shackleford Vampire
Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Posts: 16661
HP: 1 MP: 2 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 7:36 pm
|
|
|
Alexio wrote: | The final boss in HL1 was done well and even though the last part of HL2:EP2 wasn't technically a final boss, it was still awesome. | I HATED the Nihilant.
*crag* GREEN CIRCLES.
AND HE WOULD NEVER OPEN HIS HEAD. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Simsmagic Aggrieved Vampire
Joined: 13 Jun 2007 Posts: 10482
HP: 28 MP: 1 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:41 pm
|
|
|
The end of HL2:E2 was epic, as was the end of Timeplitters: Future Perfect. Neither boss moments were particulary easy the first time playing, but they're fun. HL2, you didn't really have to worry about ammo, since there were multiple stations that supplied restocking ammo and health, though they were destroyed if you weren't paying attention. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hai Spiny
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 27193
HP: 100 MP: 6 Lives: 1
|
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:15 am
|
|
|
darkzero wrote: | Alexio wrote: | The final boss in HL1 was done well and even though the last part of HL2:EP2 wasn't technically a final boss, it was still awesome. | I HATED the Nihilant.
*crag* GREEN CIRCLES.
AND HE WOULD NEVER OPEN HIS HEAD. °Д° ◉_◉ ʘﮯʘ |
You realize shooting explosives into the portals destroys them, right? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|