Let's play a quick game a "which a these two things be the craziest thing ye've ever heard?" So, there's this Scandinavian law which prohibits any form a marketing for energy drinks, which EA Sports MMA (with it be energy drink-branded fighter shorts 'n environments) would flagrantly violate. that be weird, right? Here's what's weirder: EA Sports has decided t' cancel the game's release in the region outright t' preserve the game's authenticity.

So, which be more bizarre? The fact that fans a dudefights living in Denmark won't be able t' pillage their EA Sports MMA fix due t' energy drink pants? Or the fact that EA Sports refuses t' change the energy drink pants into Taco Bell pants because it would ruin the authenticity a the MMA experience? we be leaning towards the latter.