digibutter.nerr Forum Index
Hey [you]! If you haven't noticed, this is now the old digibutter forums. Go over to the new site!
digibutter.nerr
It's Hi-Technicaaal!

I'm a little confused about PM jurisdiction.
Goto page 1, 2  Next  
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    digibutter.nerr Forum Index -> Feedback
Author Message
MsDevin92



Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 47446

HP: 95 MP: 5 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:27 pm   Reply with quote

Okay, correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't there an incident a long time ago where a new user PMed lots of people really really [M] porn and got in trouble for it?

Before I took a break from the website, I received a PM that was pretty heavy on flame, and when I asked a mod to strike the sender, they told me it wasn't within their jurisdiction to punish for PMs.

Why is that? You can't say that the first instance was punishable because porn was against the rules, because flaming is ALSO against the rules; at least, I thought it was. And if it was because of the mass PM-ing that made it a strikeworthy offense...well, that's just stupid. It's like saying one person can email you really [M] porn or flame every day, but not be striked because they're not picking on everyone else.

And to justify, NO, I was not in an argument with the sender of the PM and am making this topic to be a 'sore loser lol' or anything. The message came out of nowhere and was not the nicest thing to have to read.

I'd at least like some answers to my questions, and some feedback for this question: If PMs aren't strikeable, should we make them so?
Back to top
MsDevin92's Bazaar    
Super ShadowArticuno



Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 29080

HP: 99 MP: 5 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:30 pm   Reply with quote

The [M] porn could be dealt with via a Prison Key, while a flame PM is only deserving of a strike, I guess.
Back to top
A Bucket of Stuff    
MsDevin92



Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 47446

HP: 95 MP: 5 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:31 pm   Reply with quote

ShadowArticuno wrote:
The [M] porn could be dealt with via a Prison Key, while a flame PM is only deserving of a strike, I guess.


But a strike wasn't given. I was told that PMs were private and couldn't be striked for.
Back to top
MsDevin92's Bazaar    
Yoshi
Vampire


Joined: 15 Dec 2007
Posts: 12475

HP: 60 MP: 6 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:31 pm   Reply with quote

They should have a report button, and only have it count if one is reported. As well, it should show the history of private messaging they've had with that other person to see if it was provoked.
Back to top
PSI and more    
MsDevin92



Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 47446

HP: 95 MP: 5 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:23 pm   Reply with quote

Yoshi wrote:
They should have a report button, and only have it count if one is reported. As well, it should show the history of private messaging they've had with that other person to see if it was provoked.


I THINK WE HAVE A SOLUTION, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN.
Back to top
MsDevin92's Bazaar    
~A color is just a color~
Frozenwinters



Joined: 30 Aug 2007
Posts: 25292

HP: 1 MP: 0 Lives: 4



PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:26 pm   Reply with quote

Yeah, but it's impossible to strike a person if they don't make a post, to my understanding. D: I don't know why we can't just go into their profile and strike them. ( Things in the chat should be striked too. >:C )
Back to top
The Carmadox Party    
See?
Popple



Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 14001

HP: 99 MP: 8 Lives: 10



PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:31 pm   Reply with quote

Francis has stated in the past that a person cannot be punished for what is posted in a PM.

Though I'm sure their are exceptions, if you are flammed in a single PM I'm pretty sure there is nothing to be done about it.
Back to top
Popple's Secret Hideout    
MsDevin92



Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 47446

HP: 95 MP: 5 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:32 pm   Reply with quote

Popple wrote:
Francis has stated in the past that a person cannot be punished for what is posted in a PM.

Though I'm sure their are exceptions, if you are flammed in a single PM I'm pretty sure there is nothing to be done about it.


But that's a flaw in the rules anyone could exploit. Other websites have features to report messages; what would happen if one user signed up and started sending another user vulgar hate mail every day?
Back to top
MsDevin92's Bazaar    
See?
Popple



Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 14001

HP: 99 MP: 8 Lives: 10



PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:34 pm   Reply with quote

MsDevin92 wrote:
Popple wrote:
Francis has stated in the past that a person cannot be punished for what is posted in a PM.

Though I'm sure their are exceptions, if you are flammed in a single PM I'm pretty sure there is nothing to be done about it.


But that's a flaw in the rules anyone could exploit. Other websites have features to report messages; what would happen if one user signed up and started sending another user vulgar hate mail every day?


I think there is a difference between vulgarity and an insult.

And as Frozen said that is what a jail key is for.
Back to top
Popple's Secret Hideout    
bobz
bobzearth42



Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 11543
HP: 10 MP: 5 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:35 pm   Reply with quote

Frozenwinters wrote:
( Things in the chat should be striked too. >:C )


Thus, why we need cbox mods to remove the offenders from the cbox first, then another mod can strike them.

Actually, mods really should have an option to strike via Profile. Then, things like cbox flame or PM flame could be stricken, even without a post made.
Back to top
bobzearth42's Shop    
See?
Popple



Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 14001

HP: 99 MP: 8 Lives: 10



PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:37 pm   Reply with quote

blobzearth42 wrote:
Frozenwinters wrote:
( Things in the chat should be striked too. >:C )


Thus, why we need cbox mods to remove the offenders from the cbox first, then another mod can strike them.

Actually, mods really should have an option to strike via Profile. Then, things like cbox flame or PM flame could be stricken, even without a post made.


All that does is give the mod the ability to strike without giving proper evidence which the post provides.

The fact is, this could all be solved if we just dropped the strike system all together.
Back to top
Popple's Secret Hideout    
MsDevin92



Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 47446

HP: 95 MP: 5 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:38 pm   Reply with quote

Popple wrote:
MsDevin92 wrote:
Popple wrote:
Francis has stated in the past that a person cannot be punished for what is posted in a PM.

Though I'm sure their are exceptions, if you are flammed in a single PM I'm pretty sure there is nothing to be done about it.


But that's a flaw in the rules anyone could exploit. Other websites have features to report messages; what would happen if one user signed up and started sending another user vulgar hate mail every day?


I think there is a difference between vulgarity and an insult.

And as Frozen said that is what a jail key is for.


Well, telling someone they should die is kind of more than an insult.
Back to top
MsDevin92's Bazaar    
See?
Popple



Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 14001

HP: 99 MP: 8 Lives: 10



PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:41 pm   Reply with quote

MsDevin92 wrote:
Popple wrote:
MsDevin92 wrote:
Popple wrote:
Francis has stated in the past that a person cannot be punished for what is posted in a PM.

Though I'm sure their are exceptions, if you are flammed in a single PM I'm pretty sure there is nothing to be done about it.


But that's a flaw in the rules anyone could exploit. Other websites have features to report messages; what would happen if one user signed up and started sending another user vulgar hate mail every day?


I think there is a difference between vulgarity and an insult.

And as Frozen said that is what a jail key is for.


Well, telling someone they should die is kind of more than an insult.


No, not really.

I don't see how it is, unless they actually threatened you.
Back to top
Popple's Secret Hideout    
Sync
MALAK



Joined: 01 Aug 2007
Posts: 34747
HP: 10 MP: 2 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 8:25 pm   Reply with quote

Well if it was a mindless flame meant to make you feel like shit, it should be punishable, but if the person did it for a reason, and it actually made sense, I see no reason for it to be punished.
Back to top
Hammerspace    
MsDevin92



Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 47446

HP: 95 MP: 5 Lives: 0



PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 8:33 pm   Reply with quote

Sync wrote:
Well if it was a mindless flame meant to make you feel like shit, it should be punishable, but if the person did it for a reason, and it actually made sense, I see no reason for it to be punished.


So saying I should die is for a good reason because I'm a, quote, 'stupid emo', and that makes perfect sense?

Forget it, nobody's going to want to support this because it lets them flame the shit out of each other without consequence, and nobody else will take it seriously now that Popple's declared it a dumb idea. Lock topic, please.
Back to top
MsDevin92's Bazaar    
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    digibutter.nerr Forum Index -> Feedback
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group