| good idea to replace mods? |
| Yes. |
|
25% |
[ 3 ] |
| No |
|
41% |
[ 5 ] |
| Why not have both? |
|
33% |
[ 4 ] |
| I have an improvement (specify) |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 12 |
|
| Author |
Message |
That rich guy
Pure-???
Vampire
Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 9560
HP: 88 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:20 am
|
 |
|
how about every topic has a button where you cna vote towards (or against) deleting it. if it gets 10 points towards deletion, it is automatically deleted.
I'd say that's a pretty good idea.
poll addinated |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WHO HA HOO HEY HOOM
Paper Luigi
Vampire
Joined: 09 May 2007
Posts: 6855
HP: 1 MP: 7 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:17 am
|
|
|
|
Yeah. 'Cause then no one would go insane about being a mod. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Burn them out
rawrskey
Benned Vampire
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 14262
HP: 70 MP: 5 Lives: 5
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:35 pm
|
|
|
|
there aren't always ten people in the dump at the same time. Lower it to 5 (>'.')> |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
That rich guy
Pure-???
Vampire
Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 9560
HP: 88 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:17 pm
|
|
|
|
I was originally thinking 5, but decided it was to easy to group attack. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PEPSIMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!
Cherry
Vampire
Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 22614
HP: 65 MP: 6 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:29 pm
|
|
|
| Pure-??? wrote: | | I was originally thinking 5, but decided it was to easy to group attack. |
It's easy to group attack with 10 as well. There's really no way of doing this fairly unless you only give power to a very small group of people, the mods.
I stand by my opinion that mods are really the only way to go, considering that people may also vote selfishly or because of the author of the topic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
That rich guy
Pure-???
Vampire
Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 9560
HP: 88 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:38 pm
|
|
|
| Miles Edgeworth wrote: | | Pure-??? wrote: | | I was originally thinking 5, but decided it was to easy to group attack. |
It's easy to group attack with 10 as well. There's really no way of doing this fairly unless you only give power to a very small group of people, the mods.
I stand by my opinion that mods are really the only way to go, considering that people may also vote selfishly or because of the author of the topic. |
no! I refuse to have mods, it makes the people who aren't mods feel unrespected. why not reverse the idea, by dis-allowing certain people from doing it who can't be trusted, instead of vice versa? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWA
Francine
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 8580
HP: 78 MP: 4 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:40 pm
|
|
|
How would you gauge someone's trust level? The amount of time they've been on the site? The amount of time out of the Prison and the Underwhere? Just by opinion alone?
The traditional moderator system works the best. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
That rich guy
Pure-???
Vampire
Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 9560
HP: 88 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:44 pm
|
|
|
it's quite simple... if someone abuses it, or they are clearly untrustable from the beginning(*coughlordbowsercough*) then they can't vote for deletion.
and if we do end up with mods, there should be a voting system.
and I still think both is the best choice now.... even if I voted yes...
regardless... this took some thought... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nimexa, The Gentle Breeze
Dark Prognosticus
Burning Werewolf
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 16966
HP: 97 MP: 10 Lives: 1
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:45 pm
|
|
|
|
I like this idea but Mods are also important so both. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
That rich guy
Pure-???
Vampire
Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 9560
HP: 88 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:46 pm
|
|
|
|
and both is winning! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PEPSIMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!
Cherry
Vampire
Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 22614
HP: 65 MP: 6 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:51 pm
|
|
|
Having both doesn't make much sense to me.
Let me go over the pros and cons:
Mods:
-Pros:
--Easy to manage
--Makes sure there is little abuse in power
--Easy to discipline is power is abused.
--No chance of gang deletion.
-Cons:
--Makes people who aren't mods feel "unappreciated"
--Power can still be abused
-10 Points, your out:
-Pros:
--Gives more power to the average user
--Displays the public's point of view
-Cons:
--Allows for possible gang deletion of topics.
---Especially if Francis isn't online
--Much higher chance of power abuse due to more people
--Harder to manage (imagine a group of people deleting perfectly good posts) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
That rich guy
Pure-???
Vampire
Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 9560
HP: 88 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:55 pm
|
|
|
| Miles Edgeworth wrote: | Having both doesn't make much sense to me.
Let me go over the pros and cons:
Mods:
-Pros:
--Easy to manage
--Makes sure there is little abuse in power
--Easy to discipline is power is abused.
--No chance of gang deletion.
-Cons:
--Makes people who aren't mods feel "unappreciated"
--Power can still be abused
-10 Points, your out:
-Pros:
--Gives more power to the average user
--Displays the public's point of view
-Cons:
--Allows for possible gang deletion of topics.
---Especially if Francis isn't online
--Much higher chance of power abuse due to more people
--Harder to manage (imagine a group of people deleting perfectly good posts) |
you cna also vote against a topic being banned... so if a topic is good, you cna boost it ahed of time, protecting it of sorts... but having both in combination would be best. and maybe if we have enough mods... they could be worth 5 votes towards or against banning it? or maybe if it hits 10 it gets some kind of notice on it so mods(and francis) notice it faster? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PEPSIMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!
Cherry
Vampire
Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 22614
HP: 65 MP: 6 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:58 pm
|
|
|
| Pure-??? wrote: | | you cna also vote against a topic being banned... so if a topic is good, you cna boost it ahed of time, protecting it of sorts... but having both in combination would be best. and maybe if we have enough mods... they could be worth 5 votes towards or against banning it? or maybe if it hits 10 it gets some kind of notice on it so mods(and francis) notice it faster? |
I personally think this solution is best. If a topic gets -5 or lower, then a notice is sent to the mods of that forum to check out the topic to verify it's validity.
But, if spam occurs in any other forum, there'll probably be a mod at work anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
That rich guy
Pure-???
Vampire
Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 9560
HP: 88 MP: 5 Lives: 0
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:08 pm
|
|
|
|
ok... Imma make a new poll now.... for with the above changes... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
