|
|
Hey [you]! If you haven't noticed, this is now the old digibutter forums. Go over to the new site!
digibutter.nerr
It's Hi-Technicaaal!
|
Legalizing marijuana |
Yes |
|
50% |
[ 18 ] |
No |
|
50% |
[ 18 ] |
|
Total Votes : 36 |
|
Author |
Message |
Cid Lord Krump
Joined: 21 Apr 2007 Posts: 7880
HP: 60 MP: 2 Lives: 0
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
OH GOD Manpersonguything Werewolf
Joined: 30 Jul 2007 Posts: 7249
HP: 100 MP: 8 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:50 pm
|
|
|
My uncle got pretty messed up on legal "MJ"
I say no. It works as a pain killer and stuff, but I'm sure there is other stuff that can do the same thing, if not better. Also, many people do after getting it legally, when the perscription expires, get it illegally. And that shit is bad for you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Token Nazi? Zelnor
Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 6425
HP: 10 MP: 7 Lives: 1
|
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:21 am
|
|
|
I say once again: When have the masses ever been responsible ?
Also, you can pick up like twenty studies on every street corner. Studies are the hookers of science, it appears. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cid Lord Krump
Joined: 21 Apr 2007 Posts: 7880
HP: 60 MP: 2 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:52 am
|
|
|
Zelnor wrote: | I say once again: When have the masses ever been responsible ? |
True, the masses aren't responsible for the incidents caused by marijuana, nor are they for the incidents caused by alcohol.
So, what are you getting at?
Quote: | Also, you can pick up like twenty studies on every street corner. Studies are the hookers of science, it appears. |
What's better; citing studies conducted by scientific and health research groups that provide information on whether marijuana is truly harmful or not, or just listening to television ads and school teachers say it's bad because, well, because? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Token Nazi? Zelnor
Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 6425
HP: 10 MP: 7 Lives: 1
|
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:05 am
|
|
|
Franish wrote: | Zelnor wrote: | I say once again: When have the masses ever been responsible ? |
True, the masses aren't responsible for the incidents caused by marijuana, nor are they for the incidents caused by alcohol.
So, what are you getting at? |
I say that they aren't responsible as in they will abuse it, and with the quicker inebriation, stronger effects, etc. this may end up being more dangerous then alcohol.
EDIT: Oh, and if I hurt someone besides myself because I have consumed certain substances, then you are very responsible.
Cid wrote: |
Quote: | Also, you can pick up like twenty studies on every street corner. Studies are the hookers of science, it appears. |
What's better; citing studies conducted by scientific and health research groups that provide information on whether marijuana is truly harmful or not, or just listening to television ads and school teachers say it's bad because, well, because? |
It's a drug. It changes the brain chemistry, often in irreversible ways. People will abuse it, and its in the public mind as a drug. We'd open a pathway to legalize stronger and stronger stuff.
I know that the public wouldn't stand for a ban of alcohol and cigarettes (and as they say, everyone is his own misfortune's smith) but this is just ridiculous.
Besides, there are a million other medications out there that act as painkiller and whatever. If you're so hot on whatever the compound is, analyse marijuana and to clinical studies.
I just think that the legalization would open a floodgate. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cid Lord Krump
Joined: 21 Apr 2007 Posts: 7880
HP: 60 MP: 2 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:40 am
|
|
|
Zelnor wrote: | I say that they aren't responsible as in they will abuse it, and with the quicker inebriation, stronger effects, etc. this may end up being more dangerous then alcohol. |
I assumed you meant "responsible" as in they weren't responsible for what the idiots do with the substances.
No, if the majority of people who do drugs didn't do them responsibly, then most people who enjoy alcohol would be alcoholics (Which isn't the case.)
And if people are able to remain responsible regarding a substance that is more addictive and dangerous (Alcohol), why couldn't they with marijuana?
Quote: | EDIT: Oh, and if I hurt someone besides myself because I have consumed certain substances, then you are very responsible. |
Of course the drug user is reponsible. That's why people are encouraged to use said substances responsibly (Which most people do.)
Quote: | It's a drug. It changes the brain chemistry, often in irreversible ways. People will abuse it, and its in the public mind as a drug. We'd open a pathway to legalize stronger and stronger stuff. |
The fact remains that it isn't nearly as harmful as it is exaggerated to be, and we already have plenty of substances that are more harmful yet legal that we are still able to cope with. Plus, most reliable research leads to the conclusion that marijuana, if used casually, won't change the brain in irreversible ways. To say otherwise would be basing one's opinion on pseudo-science "conducted" by the government.
Quote: | I know that the public wouldn't stand for a ban of alcohol and cigarettes (and as they say, everyone is his own misfortune's smith) but this is just ridiculous. |
How is it ridiculous? I don't understand why one is willing to keep a substance banned when one is against the idea of far more dangerous substances being made illegal for the same reason people want marijuana legalized (And that is because if someone uses marijuana responsibly, that's their own issue, not someone else's.) Plus, plenty of people use marijuana already, despite it being illegal. Legalizing marijuana won't cause a massive increase in the use of the substance; if anything, it would cause a massive decrease in the amount of criminal activity revolving around drugs.
Quote: | I just think that the legalization would open a floodgate. |
But it wouldn't. Look to where I spoke about how the "gateway" arguement is poor. We allowed homosexuals in to our society, but that didn't cause people to get away with having sex with children. Most people who use marijuana responsibly understand that other drugs are far worse, and wouldn't use them. The idea that all people who use marijuana are addicts or are easily accepting of other drugs is a gross generalization based on a few stereotypes that get the media and government's attention (But as I said, why should the majority of people be punished for a few idiots who lack self control?) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Axolotl Sympathist Geno Werewolf
Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 8754
HP: 100 MP: 4 Lives: 1
|
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:13 pm
|
|
|
Marijuana really isn't as bad as the government says it is. Sure, it'll make you a bit retarded a while after use, but as for long-term effects... That's all government propaganda. Seriously, it is. I would know, some people I know are nuts for the stuff. They aren't addicted (since it's a non-addictive drug), so they do it for pure enjoyment. One of my best friends has been doing it for years, and he maintains the same straight-A average.
Now, to the side of "the government can't tax it". Lies. The government can tax it as easily as tobacco. Think of it this way: People grow tobacco freely. Those people could easily sell it to whoever they want, whenever they want. Yet, the government still finds a way to tax larger producers to make money. Why is it so different for marijuana? People grow it, and then sell it to whoever they want, whenever they want. So, maybe if it was legalized, companies would mass produce it, therefore letting the government tax it.
Comparison:
Tobacco companies - taxed. Independent sellers - not taxed.
Marijuana companies - taxed. Independent sellers - not taxed.
Same problem either way. Bam, no one should care. Legalize the shit. It's non-lethal, unlike other drugs that SHOULD be banned. I'm not supporting cocaine, or LSD, or heroin. No way in hell would I support those. They're health hazards (well, LSD isn't nearly as bad compared to the other 2), and if something can be smoked freely without long-term risks, why not legalize it?
Last edited by Geno on Tue Mar 17, 2009 6:59 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PEPSIMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN! Cherry Vampire
Joined: 30 Apr 2007 Posts: 22614
HP: 65 MP: 6 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:30 pm
|
|
|
Zelnor wrote: | Also, you can pick up like twenty studies on every street corner. Studies are the hookers of science, it appears. | You can't say "Let me see some studies" and then denounce the credibility of studies once someone does.
This is a popular and controversial subject, so there's going to be a lot of studies about it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ohh, THAT makes sense! Tyler Vampire
Joined: 18 Apr 2007 Posts: 11410
HP: 95 MP: 2 Lives: 4
|
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:50 pm
|
|
|
If marijuana is illegal then alcohol should be super illegal. :U |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Larry Koopa Sam
Joined: 30 Apr 2007 Posts: 16957
HP: 35 MP: 1 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:17 pm
|
|
|
Legalizing Marijuana = More stupid people in the world.
We already have more then enough stupid people. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cid Lord Krump
Joined: 21 Apr 2007 Posts: 7880
HP: 60 MP: 2 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:08 pm
|
|
|
Larry Koopa wrote: | Legalizing Marijuana = More stupid people in the world.
We already have more then enough stupid people. |
Most of the people who would buy it legally probably already buy it illegally.
Legalizing it wouldn't really affect society aside from lowering criminal activity. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PEPSIMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN! Cherry Vampire
Joined: 30 Apr 2007 Posts: 22614
HP: 65 MP: 6 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:37 pm
|
|
|
Larry Koopa wrote: | Legalizing Marijuana = More stupid people in the world.
We already have more then enough stupid people. | On the contrary, it would probably help weed out the stupid people from the smart people.
...Haha. Weed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Token Nazi? Zelnor
Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 6425
HP: 10 MP: 7 Lives: 1
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:21 am
|
|
|
Franish wrote: | (But as I said, why should the majority of people be punished for a few idiots who lack self control?) |
Let's see... School shootings and violent video games are the first example - things that most people are able to cope with go under fire and prejudice because some psychologically unstable people thought it would be the best solution to use them to plot murder.
The Law is mostly made to protect the few from the idiocity of the masses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cid Lord Krump
Joined: 21 Apr 2007 Posts: 7880
HP: 60 MP: 2 Lives: 0
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:46 am
|
|
|
Zelnor wrote: | Let's see... School shootings and violent video games are the first example - things that most people are able to cope with go under fire and prejudice because some psychologically unstable people thought it would be the best solution to use them to plot murder. |
Yes, but despite minor legislation thrown around by Jack Thompson and a few others, violent videogames haven't been banned yet. And most likely, they won't be.
And even then, by using this arguement against the legalization of marijuana, your stance becomes unclear. Do you mean that violent videogames actually cause trouble, or what? And if that's the case, are you implying that violent videogames be banned because they cause some to become trouble-makers like marijuana does? Where do you stand?
Quote: | The Law is mostly made to protect the few from the idiocity of the masses. |
The other way around. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Token Nazi? Zelnor
Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Posts: 6425
HP: 10 MP: 7 Lives: 1
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:50 am
|
|
|
Franish wrote: |
Quote: | The Law is mostly made to protect the few from the idiocity of the masses. |
The other way around. |
I congratulate you on not being jaded and / or arrogant as much as I am.
Though legalizing it just to clean up the crime statistics wouldn't help.
If it's so good, I wonder why it is illegal in the first place. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
|