digibutter.nerr

[Kirby]

Does anyone else prefer the more linear levels of Galaxy over the non-linear, free-roaming levels of Sunshine and 64? I think it keeps the game less frustrating, annoying, and boring by cutting down on time spent figuring out where to go, as well as keeps the game more ACTION-PACKED then the others.

[Spiny]

woot,first vote.

The levels are short enough to where i got 20 stars in an hour,and thats how I like it.

[Yoshi]

:shifty: Yay! Second vote.

Um, I liked anti linear. I want MORE CHALLENGE. Sunshine was fun, BECAUSE it had moving around, and now noone will be able to make youtube bloopers for this game at certain times. I liked sunshine's style. It shows you a view of where you have to go before you're there.

[Spiny]

[Legendary Mashine]

I'd like it more if it was half and half. o.o;

[Lord Rattata]

uhh, galaxy is frustrating, annoying and boring because of... well, just look at the holes in the wall of my room. That's what galaxy did to me. I have 9 stars left to find, but those missions just **** me off.

[Spiny]

give a GOOD reason why its boring.

[Tyler]

I'm pro at this game. Wish I had a camera to show off my skills. And it's not really linear... you just can't get stars from other missions like in 64. The entire game is not linear (the whole game is probably less linear than SM64), but some people feel as though the levels are.

[Tails Doll]

The levels may be linear, but who cares?

[Almaz]

It's like a 3D version of Super Mario Bros 3. By that, I mean a decently linear game with near-perfect gameplay and so much innovation it could make an avid Mario Fan cry.

What's there to dislike about it? I personally think that Galaxy was a perfect game.

[Kamek]

The level design kind of makes up for the linearity. I still like Mario 64 more, but that is because it was one of my first game and is packed with nostalgia.

[Spiny]

Its hard to belive for me that Cataquacks(the blue duck things)could be so nostalgic.

[Sind]