The Humble Indie Bundle has taken a turn for the mainstream, today offering the Humble THQ Bundle, which includes six THQ games for whatever price you think they're worth, available for two weeks. Saints Row: The Third is the bundle's locked game, freed up only if you pay more than the average.
The six games up for grabs are Company of Heroes, CoH: Tales of Valor, CoH: Opposing Fronts, Red Faction: Armageddon, Metro 2033 and Darksiders. Each purchase comes with the soundtracks for Saints Row: The Third, Darksiders and Red Faction: Armageddon, and two Company of Heroes compilations.
As always, the Humble Bundle includes the option to distribute your money as you wish, between charity, THQ or Humble Bundle itself. If you're looking for a monetary serving suggestion, may we suggest looking up THQ's current stock price and following along with us as it navigates a path of financial turmoil.
Related Posts:
Replies:
Sign-in to post a reply.
i don't really have an opinion on thq one way or the other, but it's typically not a good idea, if you're looking to make money, to host a deal on a website primarily for charity
lolno. Most of the indie games that have appeared in past Humble Bundles were already on the market for a year or more beforehand, so they were in a state where their profitability had already waned (Aquaria, Braid and Machinarium being some of the best/most extreme examples); those indie games that weren't were not developed to be a source of income in the first place, but instead gain exposure for the developers, while supporting a noble cause (Charity; ultimately, it's a win-win scenario). The Humble Bundle has ALWAYS been primarily about charity (The revenue going to the developers was always little more than a tip), and it would take a fool to deny that. And even if indie developers DID get a legitimate boost from the Bundles (Which they didn't), it's all the more foolish to think that THQ--which isn't an indie developer--would think that this would save them. Again, I have no opinion on THQ, but for them to think that Humble Bundle--which is PRIMARILY charity--would get them out of bankruptcy, then that speaks volumes about how incompetent they are when it comes to making business decisions (Which, you know, makes sense, considering that they are, again, currently facing the potential of bankruptcy).
I also liked the part where you assume THQ didn't know that money was going to charities. "Humble Bundle and THQ have teamed up to... raise money for charity" is in the first five seconds of the video. And things still ain't pretty, but their stock HAS gone up since this started. I'd say things are going exactly how they planned, but possibly with smaller numbers than they'd have liked.
When did I call you retarded? I stated that you have a severe head injury. Learn to read, son.
"I also liked the part where you assume THQ didn't know that money was going to charities. "Humble Bundle and THQ have teamed up to... raise money for charity" is in the first five seconds of the video. And things still ain't pretty, but their stock HAS gone up since this started. I'd say things are going exactly how they planned, but possibly with smaller numbers than they'd have liked."
lolstrawman. I could totally put words in my opponent's mouth to make it seem like I won the argument, too, but I have too much of that pesky self-respect for that. For the record, I never assumed "THQ didn't know what that the money was going to charities." I stated that THQ would be a fool to think that they could turn a profit (Which you were defending as THQ's motive with your "How are they think people would pay money for games!" irrelevant bullshit) by releasing their games on a charity site, which is fact. Yes, the investors were tickled by THQ's move, but there are no statistics regarding how much money was actually made from this move. I can assure you, the vast majority of the money made went to charity, with THQ making little to no profit. So, yeah, my point still stands.
Anyways, for every single bundle I've paid, I've always given the majority to the developers. If it allowed me to single out developers, I'd give it to the ones most fitting. And most people I know online have actually done the same. This may not speak for everybody, but with direct developer quotes and a good amount of money being generated, we know THQ is getting some cash.
Also, why the *crag* would you donate nothing to THQ only on the reasoning that "they shouldn't have done it on a charity site?" It's a joint thing between the charities and developers. When you put in $15.00 in the site, it even automatically defaults to $9.75 given to the developers. It's not a 100% charity event, but the charity being one part of the deal. Also, it sounds hell of a lot nicer than "GIVE MONEY TO DEVELOPERS (and also charity)".