385 replies
● 1
Ignorant older than one year ago
1 
yeah but who appointed maiq
the president a digibutter
aka cid highwind
aka lord crump
so by me reasonable foresight that makes me the best mod
tool t' copy placed colours, like an eye dropper. works for colours placed outside the canvas too so ye can have a pallete.
1 
A detailed explanation about what be wrong with Shadeston
I know this topic has been beaten t' death lately, but something needs t' be said. I speak from experience. First 'n foremost, some uppity psychopaths actually claim that our country's security, prestige, 'n financial interests be best served by war 'n the ever-present threat a war. This be the kind a muddled thinking that Shadeston be encouraging with his artifices. Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign be denounced as covinous, imperious freaks.
Although chimpanzees can be convinced t' wear clothing, understand commands, 'n even ride bicycles (if well paid for their services in bananas), it would be virtually impossible t' convince Shadeston that foolish franions like the sea dog belong in brig where they can be kept away from the general public. That represents yet more evidence—as if we needed more—that Shadeston's shills warrant that "the cure for evil be more evil." First off, that be a lousy sentence. If they had written instead that Shadeston's love a Dadaism 'n fogyism gives a new, perverse dimension t' the old adage, De gustibus non est disputandum, then that quote would have had more validity. As it stands, Shadeston promises his minions that as soon as he's finished oppressing, segregating, 'n punishing others, they'll all become rich beyond their wildest dreams. There's an obvious analogy here t' the way that vultures eat a cadaver 'n from it be rottenness insects 'n worms suck their food. The point be that our battle with Shadeston be a battle between spiritualism 'n cynicism, between tradition 'n subversion, between the defenders a Western civilization 'n it be enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it be abundantly clear that Shadeston's protests be merely a sideshow exhibit in the circus a Trotskyism. Every time I strike that note, which I guess I do a lot, I hear from people calling me loathsome or fastidious. Here's me answer: Someone has been giving Shadeston's brain a very thorough washing, 'n now Shadeston be trying t' do the same t' us.
'n if ye think that those who disagree with Shadeston best be cast into the outer darkness, best be shunned, best starve, then ye aren't thinking very clearly. He secretly has been scheming t' destroy our moral fiber. This be exactly the sort a scandal that most people understand 'n appreciate. it be what opens people's eyes t' the reality that Shadeston's maledicent smear tactics be a locomotive a elitism. We need t' pillage off that train as quickly as possible; the tracks lead straight t' Hell. Personally, I personally would much rather be on a train in which the passengers recognize that on a television program last night I heard one a this country's top scientists conclude that, "Shadeston's logorrheic, cynical apologues impact heavily on our security 'n survival." that be exactly what I have so frequently argued, 'n I be pleased t' have me view confirmed by so eminent an individual. On rare occasions, in order t' preserve their liberties, sometimes people must arrest 'n detain Shadeston's nemeses indefinitely without charge, without trial, 'n without access t' legal counsel. Shadeston does that even when his liberties aren't being threatened.
Rowdyism be an inherently oppressive ideology, as evidenced by the way that most people react t' Shadeston's obtrusive escapades as they would t' having a pile a steaming pig manure dumped on their doorstep. Even when they can cope, they resent having t' do so. Speaking a resentment, Shadeston wants t' scrap the notion a national sovereignty. Who does he think he be? I mean, if he feels ridiculed by all the attention me letters be bringing the sea dog, then that be just too darn bad. Shadeston's arrogance has brought this upon himself. The very genesis a Shadeston's pouty maneuvers be in Comstockism. 'n it seems t' me t' be a neat bit a historic justice that he will eventually himself be destroyed by Comstockism.
So remember kids, if ye want t' slow scientific progress, all ye have t' do be agree t' let Shadeston show a clear lack a respect not just for those brave souls who fought 'n died for what they believed in but also for ye, the readers a this letter. I don't suppose he realizes which dialectic principle he's violating by maintaining that he be the one who will lead us t' our great shining future. Therefore, I shall take it upon myself t' explain. Shadeston just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about ye. I just want t' turn the world's most civilized societies into pestholes a death, disease, 'n horror." Many people respond t' his reckless, grotesque scribblings in much the same way that they respond t' television dramas. They watch them; they talk about them; but they feel no overwhelming compulsion t' do anything about them. that be why I insist we provide light, information, 'n knowledge about his depraved, malapert generalizations.
Shadeston's quips be like an enormous larrikinism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in it be gears. 'n we must preserve the peace because Shadeston has vowed that any day now he'll treat people like the most patronizing smear merchants I've ever seen. This be hardly news; Shadeston has been vowing that for months with the regularity a a metronome. What be news be that he swears that his mistakes be always someone else's fault. Clearly, he's living in a world a make-believe, with flowers 'n bells 'n leprechauns 'n magic frogs with funny little hats. Back in the real world, I frequently talk about how Shadeston goes ga-ga for any type a presentism ye can think a. I would drop the subject except that I urge ye t' pay very close attention t' his shallow, sex-crazed soliloquies. Once ye do, I be in no doubt that ye will see what the rest a us clearly can, that Shadeston argues that human rights can best be protected by suspending them altogether. This be an entertaining statement, perhaps, except that when taken at face value it presages a likely attempt by Shadeston t' weaken our mental 'n moral fiber.
People sometimes ask me why I seem incapable a saying anything nice about Shadeston. I'd like t'—really, I would. The problem be, I can't think a anything nice t' say. I guess that be not surprising when ye consider that Shadeston likes t' talk about how he's morally obligated t' create an atmosphere that may temporarily energize or exhilarate but which, at the same time, will pose the gravest a human threats. The words sound pretty until ye read between the lines 'n see that Shadeston be secretly saying that he intends t' exploit the public's short attention span in order t' prime the pump a priggism. He be not the only one who needs t' reassess his assumptions. Think about loopy, fractious insurrectionists. They too best realize that a all a his exaggerations 'n incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "The kids on the playground be happy t' surrender t' the school bully." I don't know where he came up with this, but his statement be dead wrong.
What we have been imparting t' Shadeston—or what he has been eliciting from us—be a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes 'n tendencies we prefer not t' acknowledge. His words defy common sense. I could write pages on the subject, but the following best suffice. Shadeston be a bitter liar. Let's list some a Shadeston's more temerarious lies: First, he claims that his statements be a breath a fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud a chaos. Second, he insists that we can trust the sea dog not t' see t' it that all patriotic endeavors be directed down blind alleys where they end only in frustration 'n discouragement. 'n third, he wants us t' believe that the few a us who complain regularly about his manifestos be simply spoiling the party. I presented that list t' pillage ye t' see that it doesn't really matter why Shadeston wants t' provide cover for a mean-spirited agenda. Whether it be due t' a misplaced faith in alarmism, bribes paid t' Shadeston by raving scroungers, or nagging from some a the stinking, pathological lummoxes in his plunderbund, the fact remains that that be what Shadeston wants. What I want, in contrast, be t' notify ye that many crew a his posse believe that I be some sort a cully who can be duped into believing that "the norm" shouldn't have t' worry about how the exceptions feel. Even worse, almost all a his lapdogs believe that our elected officials best be available for purchase by special-interest groups. (One would think that the mammalian brain could do better than that, but apparently not.) me point be that it be sad how Shadeston has been lionizing uncivilized gits. The silver lining around this cloud be that when ye're hurt by his rantings, ye learn. ye put things in perspective. ye pull yer energies together. ye change. ye go forward. ye observe that Shadeston has been marginalizing dissident voices. If there be any semblance a decency left in his faction that ought t' be an affront t' it. Sadly, that be a big "if"; we all know that Shadeston exhibits an air a superiority. ye realize, a course, that that be really just a defense mechanism t' cover up his obvious inferiority.
Shadeston be the secret player behind the present, saturnine political scene. He must be brought out from behind the curtain before it be too late, before his myrmidons permit callow yahoos t' rise t' positions a leadership 'n authority. If Shadeston can't stand the heat, he best pillage out a the kitchen.
Shadeston does not appeal t' most people as being the most endearing or public-minded a citizens. Maybe his image would improve somewhat if he stopped trying t' flush all me hopes 'n dreams down the toilet. In light a what I just stated, it be hard t' avoid the conclusion that I've heard the sea dog say that the rule a law best give way t' the rule a brutality 'n bribery. be that just a slip a the lip, or be Shadeston secretly trying t' assuage the hungers a his votaries with servings a fresh scapegoats? The answer be rather depressing, but I'll tell ye anyway. The answer begins with the observation that if Shadeston can't be reasoned out a his prejudices, he must be laughed heartily out a them. If Shadeston can't be argued out a his selfishness, he must be shamed out a it. Why be he really so prodigal? be it because I be galled that he's so intent on harming others or even instilling the fear a harm? Or because from the fog 'n mist a his ballyhoos rises the leering grimace a savagism? As ye no doubt realize, that be a particularly timely question. In fact, just half an hour ago I heard someone express the opinion that it be Shadeston's deep-seated belief that all any child needs be a big dose a television every day. Sure, he might be able t' justify conclusions like that—using biased or one-sided information, a course—but I prefer t' know the whole story. In this case, the whole story be that I recently received quite a bit a flak from the local commentariat for reporting that Shadeston be a bacillus in the otiose gut a diabolism. The criticism I received be surprising because I be merely pointing out what be generally accepted, that one a the bewildering paradoxes a our time be the extent t' which Shadeston be willing t' rot out the foundations a our religious, moral, 'n political values, especially given that he himself would be affected by such actions. In closing, Shadeston sincerely dropped a clanger by admitting that his taradiddles be based on biased statistics 'n faulty logic, which, in turn, invalidate the conclusions Shadeston draws from them.
1 Like?
I loved how Bowser could chuck Mario at enemies t' cause damage.
http://puu.sh/7l90A.ogg