Lord Crump older than one year ago

Changes: multiple new rooms, two new bosses, a new partner, an actual chance t' test out yer FIRST partner's abilities, 'n THE PLOT THICKENS.

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=9NKLSN5S

This be made with a different version a Game Maker, so if it still doesn't work for ye, Nassy, or ye, Dim, then all I can say be that I be stumped. ye'll eventually be able t' play this GLORIOUS shoot-em' up game thingy, though, don't worry.

Here's the second version a Franis 2. The big changes be healing bottles a rum, a new room, a new party member (Most a this version's changes be dedicated t' the party member logic, which I couldn't pillage t' work for some stupid reason, until now, that be), 'n ye can save 'n load games (Saving after each fight be a pretty good idea).

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=S0Z2TAXX

If ye're one a the few people who could not pillage the first version t' work, try downloading this one 'n see if it runs. I be still unsure a what the problem be; if ye pillage an error, screencap it for me.

So I assumed Plastic Mario wouldn't mind/care if I took that old franis Game Maker game he made a long time ago 'n turned it into a sequel a sorts (a course, if for some strange reason he DOES mind, I'll AVAST! immediately). Like the original, crew a digibutter will make appearances in the game (With starring roles for loafSKZ, Nastasia, 'n franis, obviously).

Here be the first demo. It only has one "level" so far, but who gives a shit. it be a demo. :3

Controls: arrow 'n s keys. 'n yeah, this be related t' the "Digibutter: The Game" project.

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away...

Cap'n Francis SAID, "LET THERE BE NERRS." 'n he saw the nerrs, 'n saw that it be good.

He commanded them t' make the "ultimate totally AHOY-technical community Game Maker game ever."

'n so we SHALL. Here be me contribution. PROVIDE YOURS 'n IT WILL BE A GAME FOR THE AGES

(Also we need t' contact Plastic Mario 'n see if he still has his franis game)

I be VERY EXCITED

...be that it be too hard t' navigate. BUT I PROPOSE A SOLUTION!

We can keep the format largely the same in terms a content delivery, but tweak it a bit. By that I mean making topics more noticeable 'n the general site more easy t' navigate.

me proposition, Cap'n Francis, be well within yer coding capabilities, I would think, 'n it would not be too difficult t' construct. Nor do I think it would eat up too many resources. Essentially, what best happen be that the site best be more graphically focused. Here's what I mean by that.

Imagine that the site be wiped clean. There be no topics, no crew... nothing. The site would be represented as a blank field (Which ye can choose different skins for the "floor"). Now, let's say someone joins. Say, Nastasia joins the site for the first time. A member profile will be made for the wench, 'n she'll have the wench own message board; pretty much like the current site. There will be a little flag going up on the right hand side a the screen notifying that there be new crew; when ye click the little notification graphic, Nastasia's name shows up. However, here's the thing: a little graphic will appear on the field. It will probably look like a little smiley face or something by default. Nastasia, however, could edit this; she could make it a little sprite representation a herself, for example. Or she could upload an image or something.

Anyway, when a user clicks on this little Nastasia graphic, the wench User Message Board pops up, in addition t' little buttons that can allow ye t' navigate t' different sections a the wench profile.

This will happen when every member joins; a default graphic will appear on the previously empty "field," that they will edit 'n make it their own graphics. When ye click on the "Newest crew" thing on the right-hand side, the user list will pop up, 'n when ye click on a name, ye will be navigated t' the User's graphic on the field.

The same thing will happen when a new message board be created; the creator a the board could edit the image 'n it will appear on the field. The thing be, though, be that crew will be REQUIRED t' choose one a five categories for the board when it be created: General, Off-Topic, Gaming, RP, or Groups.

Now that there's two kinds a graphics,  when ye click on the "Message Boards" thing on the right hand side a the screen, all a the User graphics will go away 'n all the Message Board graphics will come t' the front a the screen; likewise, clicking "crew" will make all the Message Board graphics go away 'n display all the User graphics. 'n clicking on an individual User or Message Board in the list will navigate t' that graphic (Think a the Mii Channel on the Wii, 'n how ye can organize/manage/search Miis).

As for the message boards, instead a having the "ignore" feature, people already in the message board could, like in an online game match, vote t' "kick" a user out a that message board. In the end, this would make things more easily manageable.

so whaddya think

"I have been following the stories 'n comments surrounding Lord Crump, 'n frankly, I be appalled. Why doesn't Crump try doing something constructive for once in his life? First off, there be some jejune freebooters who be cranky. There be also some who be deceitful. Which category does Crump fall into? If the question overwhelms ye, I suggest ye check "both". If ye can go more than a minute without hearing the sea dog talk about adversarialism, ye're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case a denial.

"If the human race be t' survive on this planet, we will have t' expose some a Crump's short-sighted deeds. Okay, that be a facetious statement. This one be not: Crump will do everything in his power t' weave his disingenuous traits, disgusting perversions, 'n dictatorial bait-'n-switch tactics into a rich tapestry that be sure t' insult me intelligence. No wonder corruption be endemic t' our society; Crump plans t' embark on wholesale torture 'n slaughter a innocent civilians. He has instructed his mercenaries not t' discuss this or even admit t' his plan's existence. Obviously, Crump knows he has something t' hide.

"Mass anxiety be the equivalent a steroids for Crump. If we feel helpless, Crump be energized 'n ramps up his efforts t' substitute pap for art. Imagine people everywhere embracing his claim that he be omnipotent. The idea defies the imagination. His chums contend that he be God's representative on Earth. I say t' them, "Prove it"—not that they'll be able t', a course, but because I find it amusing how all thinking people simultaneously flinched when they heard Crump insist that he can succeed without trying. I don't think anyone questions that. But did ye know that it be widely known 'n beyond dispute that his speeches sail away the impression a an army a pompous phrases moving over the landscape in search a an idea? Unfortunately, I can already see the response t' this letter. Someone, possibly Lord Crump himself or one a his subordinates, will write a sinister piece about how prissy I be. If that be the case, then so be it. What I just wrote sorely needed t' be written." --some lad

WAAAAAAAAA ; ;

It kinda disgusts me how divided this whole issue be. I do hold immense sympathy for the Palestinians, but some pro-Palestine individuals be in the extreme, thinking that it be a good idea t' kick out all a the Jews living in the region, justifying it by saying, "WELL, it be THE PALESTINIANS' HOMELAND." No shit, but take a second t' think about this. Most a the Jews that be alive when Palestine be transformed in t' Israel be now dead, 'n the vast majority a the Jews currently living in Israel/Palestine be born 'n raised there. it be their homeland too, damnit. In other words, Israel shouldn't have existed in the first place, but now it does, 'n a solution t' the conflict must accomodate that.

Saying that the Palestinians best have the land be just as incorrect as saying that the Israelis best have the land. The only correct hope be t' hope that both can have the land, 'n prosper in it as brethren. With that said, the first step t' solving the problem be t' hope that the Israeli government will eventually AVAST! treating the Palestinians as dogs 'n let them live 'n participate in the government as equal citizens. I don't support any solution that involves a radical deconstruction a the government a Israel, however; that will only create more problems than it will solve.

The Bitlands theme be nice 'n all, but some a us would like t' see a bit more choice; ye know, multiple skins. Cap'n Francis, when ('n if) ye see this, note that this be related t' that message I sent ye about a new "style" for digibutter t' correspond with upcoming major Nintendo videogames that be not only a interest t' our community but t' potential new crew, as well.

For example, the default, non-registered member skin could be based on Paper Mario 3DS (t' lure in any fans a the upcoming game), whereas when ye register, ye can pillage a choice between the default skin, the "classic" Bitlands theme, or some new ones; for example, ye could create a Skyward Sword theme or a Super Mario Galaxy theme for us t' use.

Also ('n I already know ye're going t' shoot this one down), being able t' create our own avatars be dandy 'n all, but we best also have the option a uploading an avatar image, like a more conventional social website. There's only so much we can do with the image creator; I know it fits in with the theme a the site 'n all, but as I suggested, it would be a very good idea for us t' have more stylistic options, instead a just one.

...t' be completely honest, it isn't that great. I mean, Kid Icarus: Uprising looks fun 'n all, 'n I be looking forward t' it, but it baffles me as t' why it be being made in the first place when the original game isn't very fun. Kid Icarus NES just isn't very polished; the level design be terrible, the difficulty isn't so much challenging as it be frustrating, 'n the controls can be blech at times. With that said, I've only been through two stages; does it pillage any better? Because so far, it isn't as great as some people have made it out t' be.

(I be aware that there be a second Kid Icarus title for the Gameboy).

Frome here on, this will be digibutter's new mascot.

Not that OoT's critical average matters taking factors such as the amount a reviews, how many reviewers be actually credible or be now defunct, etc., but the fandumb's reaction be bound t' be entertaining

I could just copy/paste the text, but I'll link t' the topic I made on another sea. K', discuss

Once upon a time, a Tanuki be heading down t' the local marketplace t' purchase some more sake when

Read the review at the link I just gave ye. Go ahead, I'll wait.

I doubt I've ever read a more stupid critique in me life. I mean, what the hell? I could understand giving the film an incredibly low one star if he, ye know, actually explained how the film be bad based on it be artistic merits. that be what critics be supposed t' do, right? Good critics, that be. Provide an objective-as-possible take on a movie, considering the quality a it be acting, script, cinematography, 'n other important qualities.

Ebert didn't do this. Instead, he wrote a mindless  rant on how the movie be supposedly "immoral."

First off, newsflash, Mr. Ebert: it be a movie. If ye can be offended by pure fantasy such as this, then ye're an egotistical moron who's obsessed with upholding a moral code that has essentially become meaningless.

Secondly, there's a certain amount a hypocrisy at work here. Roger Ebert has actually worked on films in the past that could be considered "immoral" in the same way this film be. Also, why doesn't he complain about Tarantino? Tarantino directs all sorts a films with over-the-top violence treated in silly ways.

be it because "oh, it be a cute little wench, she shouldn't be doing those things?" No. that be a stupid argument. Grown adults shouldn't be doing those things either. By using that argument ye're essentially arguing, "well, it be not okay for little girls t' kill people, but I have no problem with grown men killing other grown men! Da-derp-da-derpity-dumb."

Jesus Christ, this lad's going senile, I swear t' God. He'll trash anything he deems too "immoral" for his pompous tastes 'n like shit like the Garfield movie just because it be "family friendly."

ye be all t' address "Frozen" as Fludgewidgeon

Or at least pillage a D in it.

Shit.

Now that I have yer attention, do ye agree or disagree, 'n why?